CHAPTER 15
SYNOPSIS OF THE CHAPTER
He proves the resurrection of the dead against the false teachers who denied it:
i. From the fact of Christ's resurrection. Thus (
ver. 35), and then names the four endowments of the glorified body (
ver. 42).
iv. He shows that we shall all rise again, but shall not all be changed, and that in the resurrection which shall take place, in a moment, when the trumpet shall sound, death will be completely swallowed up (
Vers. 35, 36.But some man will say . . . except it die. The Apostle strikes here at the root of their disease and the cause of their error, which was that some were despairing of and denying the resurrection of the body, because they saw that it rotted in the ground, and they thought therefore it was incredible and impossible for it to be raised again and refashioned. S Paul here answers this objection by pointing to a grain of corn which is sown. It first rots and dies away in the earth, and then as it were is born again and springs up, and brings forth, not merely one grain, but many grains from the one. In this way the one grain which is sown is clothed and laden at the harvest with many ears and grains, so that it seems to rise with greater glory. In the same way our bodies will rot in the ground, and thence rise to greater glory.
Ver. 37.Thou sowest not that body that shall be. When you sow you do not sow the body which will rise from the seed, as, e.g., a tree or an ear, but bare seed, of apple, or of wheat, &c., and yet God gives to this seed sown, when it spring from the earth, not any other seed, but a complete and beautiful body, e.g., of a tree or of an ear, which is beautifully composed of its own stalk, beard, blossoms, and grains. Hence S. Augustine says (Ep. 146) that the Apostle implies, "if God can add to the new seed something it had not before, much more can He at the resurrection restore man's body."
Ver. 42.So also is the resurrection of the dead. As there is one brightness of the sun, another of the moon, another of the stars, so will God give to each of the blessed the blessed and glorious body that belongs to him, and that is proportioned to his merits.
The saints and blessed are well compared to stars for reasons which I have given when commenting on Rom_4:18. Moreover, as one star outshines another, so does one saint in heaven excel anotheras in grace and merits, so in the glory and reward that he receives, and "the star of virginity shines among all as the moon among lesser lights."
So S. Dominic, while still a boy, appeared to a noble matron in a vision, wearing on his forehead a bright star which irradiated the whole world (Vita, lib. i. c. 1, and cap. ult.); and it is said of the high-priest Simon, son of Onias (Ecclus. 1:6): "As the morning star shines in the midst of a cloud, and as the full moon in her days, or as the noonday sun, so did he shine in the Temple of God." Similar things are told us of other saints. Learned men and teachers of righteousness and holiness will call to mind the verse (Dan_12:3): "They that be wise shall shine as the brightness of the firmament, and they that turn many to righteousness as the stars for ever and ever." (Cf. Wisd. 3) Hence Christ, too, says (Rev_22:16). "I am the bright and morning star," and in Rev_1:20: "The seven stars are the angels" (i.e., the doctors and bishops) "of the seven churches;" and in Rev. xii. 1, the Church appeared to S. John like a woman having on her head a crown of twelve stars, that is of the twelve Apostles, who, like stars, shed their light over the Church, and that on the head, i.e., in the beginning of the Church, as Primasius, Aretas, Andrew Bishop of Cæsarea, Bede, and others explain it. Lastly, in Rev. ii. 28, Christ says: "And he that overcometh, to him will I give the morning star," i.e., glory and the beatific vision, which is called a star because of the brightness of its light and the clearness of the vision. It is called the morning star, both because it is given after the night of this world, and because it is the beginning of the blessedness which will be completed at the resurrection of the body. Cf. Richard Victor, Primasius, and Aretas.
It is sown in corruption; it is raised in incorruption. 1. It is sown in creation, when the corruptible body is produced by the direct act of God, or from the seed of the father. So Anselm. 2. Better, it is sown a human body when it is buried, and thrown like seed into the ground to be eaten by worms and changed into dust; for so grain, when sown in the ground, is cast forth, buried, and corrupted. So Chrysostom, Ambrose, Anselm.
Hence they have erred who supposed that the resurrection will take place through the powers of nature, and that we shall rise by natural strength; as though in the ashes of the corpse were latent seminal powers, able to make it rise again. S. Thomas refers to these men. This is an error opposed to the faith and to true philosophy, both of which declare that the resurrection is above the powers of nature. The Apostle does not compare the body to seed sown in this respect, but he merely points to the fact that, as God has given to each seed its own body, so that, e.g., wheat springs from wheat and not barley, so to each of the blessed will He give a body corresponding to his work and merit. That this is his meaning, appears from the following verses. To bring this out more clearly, S. Paul adduced, in
vers. 39 and 40, a similitude drawn from the difference existing in the flesh and bodies of different creatures.
The seed dying and springing up again, and as it were rising from death, is a remarkable image and proof of the resurrection. Hence S. Augustine (Serm. 34 de Verb. Apost.) says: "The whole government of this world is a witness to the resurrection. We see the trees at the approach of winter stripped of their fruits and shorn of their foliage, and yet in the spring set forth a kind of resurrection; for they first of all begin to shoot forth buds, then they are adorned with blossoms, clad with leaves, and laden with fruit. I ask you who believe not in the resurrection, Where are those things hidden which God in His own good time brings forth? They are nowhere seen, yet God, who is Almighty, and created them from nothing, produces them by His secret power. Then look at the meadows and fields, which after summer are stripped of their grass and flowers, and remain nothing but a bare expanse of ground; yet in the spring they are again clad, and rejoice the heart of the husbandman when he sees the grass again springing up in newness of life. Truly, the grass which lived and died again lives from the seed; so, too, does our body live again from the dust."
Ver. 43.It is sown in dishonour. Man's body when it is buried and thrown like seed into the ground, is base, thick, heavy, opaque.
It is raised in glory. It will rise glorious clear, resplendent. The Apostle here strikes at another root of their error. There were some who at that time denied the resurrection of the body on the ground that the body, as being heavy and fleshy, was unfitted to be the home of the soul in bliss, and to enjoy the Divine life, as S. Dionysius testifies when refuting them (Eccles. Hierarch. c. 7). The Apostle cuts this away by declaring that to the soul in glory a corresponding glorified body must be given.
It is sown in weakness. Is weak, slow, inert when it dies and is buried.
It is raised in power. Powerful, quick, agile.
Ver. 44.It is sown a natural body. It dies as it lived: its life was vegetative and sensitive, and needed for its support food and drink, like the life of other animals. So, too, it was solid, inert, unable to give place to other bodies, and impenetrable. Such was the body of Adam, even in Paradise. The natural body is one that eats, drinks, sleeps, digests, toils, suffers fatigue, is heavy, and offers resistance to other bodies.
It is raised a spiritual body. 1. Not that the body is to be changed into a spirit or into an aërial body, as Origen and Eutychius, Patriarch of Constantinople in the time of S. Gregory, thought (he was convinced by S. Gregory and abandoned his error), but spiritual in the sense of being wholly subject and conformed to the spirit, so that it no longer stands in need of food or drink, it toils not, and feels no weariness, but is, so to speak, heavenly and deified, and, as Tertullian says, is, as it were, changed into the angelic nature. So S. Augustine (de Fide et Symb. c. 6) says: "It is called a spiritual body, not because it is changed into spirit, but because it is so subdued to the spirit that it is fitted for its heavenly dwelling-place, when all weakness and earthly frailty have been taken away, and transformed into celestial strength." Yet (c. 10) he seems to say that in the resurrection the body will not be of the flesh, but like that of angels. He retracts this, however, afterwards (Retract. lib. i. c. 17), and more at length (de Civ. Dei, lib. ult. c. 5 and 21).
2. Spiritual denotes subtilty, freedom from that heaviness and solidity that fills space, i.e., from that property of body by which it so fills space as to exclude all other bodies. The spiritual body will be subtle, as free from this property, and able, like spirit, to penetrate and fill all other bodies. Cf. Damascene (de Fide, lib. iv. c. 28) and Epiphanius (in Hæres. Orig.). For, as God can take from man his property, viz., the power of laughing, and can take from fire the heat which is the property of fire, so from body can He take away solidity, which is the property of natural bodily substance.
This gift of subtilty, however, will not be a quality infused into the soul, for this seems an impossibility. It will be an assisting presence of Divine power, internal to the soul in bliss, so that the soul can, at its pleasure, lay aside the solidity by which it excludes other bodies, when it wishes to penetrate into them; and can, on the other hand, retain it when it wishes to occupy space and exclude other bodies.
Paul answers the question with an insult and a seed. Chrysostom reduces the objection at v. 35 to two distinct questions — is it possible, and with what qualities will they rise — and the rest of the chapter takes them in that order. The image chosen for the first is exact about the thing that troubled the objectors: thou sowest not the body that shall be, but bare grain (v. 37). What goes into the ground rots, and what comes up has stalk and beard and blossom, a body the seed never had. And the passage ends on a surprise of grammar. Where v. 48 has been describing what is the case, v. 49 in the Douay turns hortatory — let us bear also the image of the heavenly — an instruction where the argument had led one to expect a forecast.
Cornelius a Lapide is careful about how far the seed may be pressed, because it can be pressed into a heresy. Some concluded that seminal powers lie latent in the ashes of a corpse and that the body therefore rises by natural strength; Aquinas notes those men, and Lapide answers that this is against faith and sound philosophy alike, since the resurrection is above nature altogether. The comparison establishes only that God gives each seed the body proper to it, wheat from wheat and not barley, and so will give each of the blessed a body proportioned to his merit — as one star differs from another in brightness. Augustine argues from the greater: if God can add to a sown seed something it never had, much more can he restore a man's body; elsewhere he calls the whole government of the world a witness, the stripped trees budding and bare fields clothing themselves again in spring. On the second question Lapide draws four endowments from the paired verbs of vv. 42-44 — incorruption, then glory, the buried body base, thick and opaque, rising clear and resplendent, then power in place of inertia, then the spiritual body. That last term caused the worst trouble. Origen, and Eutychius of Constantinople until Gregory talked him out of it, took spiritual to mean converted into spirit or into air. Augustine fixes the sense: it is called spiritual not because it is changed into spirit but because it is so subdued to the spirit that it is fitted for a heavenly dwelling — a definition he had to correct his own earlier statement to reach. Tertullian says the body is as it were changed into the angelic nature; and against those whom Dionysius records as denying the resurrection because gross flesh was unfit to house a soul in bliss, Lapide's reply is simply that a glorified soul must be given a body to match.
The Corinthian objection survives, but its modern form is more sentimental than philosophical: the body as packaging, the self as something released at death. Witham's gloss on Adam as a living soul concedes half of it — this body eats, sleeps, tires and decays, and Lapide adds that it dies as it lived — but the concession runs the other way: what is corruptible is exactly what is promised incorruption. The opposite modern error is the tidy naturalism that hears the seed and thinks the matter settles itself, spring following winter by its own machinery. Augustine's meadows are offered as a witness, not as a mechanism; he asks where those things were hidden, and answers that they were nowhere to be seen. Which leaves the imperative of v. 49, and Witham takes it plainly: the image of the heavenly man is borne now, by imitation, in a body that still gets tired.