✠ daily readings

jump to a date

readings are available from 2025-01-01 through 2026-12-31.

search

search by feast, season, or scripture reference.

type to search…

←
Fri · Sep 18, 2026 · Ordinary Time

Friday of the 24th week of Ordinary Time

→
USCCB ↗

First Reading · 1 Corinthians 15:12-20

12Now if Christ be preached, that he arose again from the dead, how do some among you say that there is no resurrection of the dead?13But if there be no resurrection of the dead, then Christ is not risen again.14And if Christ be not risen again, then is our preaching vain: and your faith is also vain.15Yea, and we are found false witnesses of God: because we have given testimony against God, that he hath raised up Christ, whom he hath not raised up, if the dead rise not again.16For if the dead rise not again, neither is Christ risen again.17And if Christ be not risen again, your faith is vain: for you are yet in your sins.18Then they also that are fallen asleep in Christ are perished.19If in this life only we have hope in Christ, we are of all men most miserable.20But now Christ is risen from the dead, the firstfruits of them that sleep:

commentary

Paul states the same conditional twice, and the repetition is the argument. At v. 13 he runs it one way — if there is no resurrection of the dead, then Christ is not risen — and at v. 16 he runs it back again in the identical words, because his opponents were willing to grant the particular case while denying the general one. Witham lays out the chain that hangs from it in seven links: no resurrection, no risen Christ; no risen Christ, no faith; no faith, then apostles who worked miracles to confirm a lie; and so down to the last, that if the body does not rise the soul was never freed from sin. The chapter's final word is agricultural. Christ is the firstfruits (v. 20), the earliest sheaf that the Old Law required to be offered to God — a term, Cornelius a Lapide notes, that means nothing on its own and implies a field behind it.

Lapide identifies the deniers as Cerinthus and his followers, the first heresiarch after Simon Magus to reject the resurrection, on the report of Eusebius and Epiphanius; Ignatius censures the error in his letters to Smyrna and Tralles, and Hymenaeus and Philetus held it too. Cerinthus was a Judaizer who read every prophecy about the Church as a promise of an earthly kingdom, of riches and bodily pleasure, and so became the parent of the Millenarians — the resurrection dropped not from too little interest in the body but from too much. Why the denial is fatal Lapide argues three ways at v. 17: a faith in a risen Christ who did not rise is a false faith, and a false faith cannot be the foundation of justification; a Christ held down by death was overcome by it, and could not have overcome sin, which is the heavier task; and since the Resurrection is the cause of our justification, removing the cause removes the effect. The anthropology under v. 18 is what makes it bite — the soul is the form of the body and cannot subsist for ever without it unless God strips it of its own nature by violence, so a denial of the body's rising drags the soul down with it. Hence the misery of v. 19, where Anselm and Chrysostom observe that Paul does not write that we are worse off, but miserable: it is a wretched thing to fast and be persecuted for a prize that is not there. Aquinas adds five further reasons why Christ had to rise, and Chrysostom, Ambrose, Theophylact and Theodoret agree on the point of order — the dead raised by Elijah and Elisha came back to a mortal life and died again; Christ is first to rise into a life that does not end.

The version of this error that survives is not Cerinthus's but its mirror: a Christianity kept for its ethics and its consolations, with the resurrection quietly reclassified as a way of speaking. Paul does not treat that as a thinner faith but as a false one, and calls its preachers false witnesses of God (v. 15). Nor is the refined alternative — the soul's survival, the body left behind as packaging — any better; Lapide grants that God could have willed the soul beatified alone, and simply reports that he did not, because a victory over sin that left death holding the body would be a partial victory. What is left is a harder and more physical hope than either. The grain went into the ground and came up as the first sheaf of a harvest, and the first sheaf is offered precisely because the rest of the field is coming.

· sources ·

The complete public-domain commentary this reading's note draws from, unabridged. Every claim in the note traces to a passage here.

First Reading 1 Corinthians 15:12-20

The Great Biblical Commentary of Cornelius a Lapide · Public Domain
15:5–28

CHAPTER 15

SYNOPSIS OF THE CHAPTER

He proves the resurrection of the dead against the false teachers who denied it:

i. From the fact of Christ's resurrection. Thus (

ver. 12) he gives the bearing of it on our resurrection.

ii. He proves the resurrection by the authority of those who are baptized for the dead (

Ver. 12.How say some among you that there is no resurrection of the dead? Cerinthus with his followers are meant here. He was the first heresiarch after Simon Magus to deny, in S. Paul's time, the resurrection. See Eusebius (Hist. lib. vii. c. 23, and lib. iii. c. 28) and Epiphanius (Hæres. 28). Cerinthus was a champion of Judaism, and, founding his opinions on Jewish traditions, he referred all the prophecies about the Church and the Gospel law to an earthly kingdom, and to riches, and to bodily pleasures. In the same way he afterwards perverted the meaning of Rev. xx. 4, and became the parent of the Chiliasts, or the Millennarian heretics. Some think from this that he was the author of the Apocalypse, and that it should therefore be rejected.

S. Ignatius, in his epistle to the Churches of Smyrna and Tralles, censures this error and its author. Hymenæus and Philetus (2Ti_2:17) also denied the resurrection.

Ver. 13.But if there be no resurrection of the dead, then is Christ not risen. Not only because Christ was one of the dead, but also because the primary cause of Christ's death and resurrection was the complete destruction of death, and the restoration of life. Moreover, the resurrection of Christ was a pattern of ours, i.e., of our resurrection to righteousness in this life, and to glory in the next. See S. Thomas (p. 3, qu. 53, art. 1) for five other reasons why it was necessary for Christ to rise again.

Ver. 17.If Christ be not raised, your faith is vain; ye are yet in your sins. It rightly follows that, if Christ has not risen, we are still in our sins; for 1. if Christ has not risen, therefore faith in a risen Christ, which is the basis of justification, is false; but a false faith cannot be the beginning and foundation of remission of sins and of true sanctification. 2. If Christ remained in death, He was overcome by it, and His death was ineffectual for the remission of sins; for if by His resurrection He could not overcome death, then He could not overcome sin, for it is more difficult and a heavier task to overcome this than to overcome death. If this be so, sin is not fully abolished, if its penalty death is not.

3. The resurrection of Christ is the cause of our justification. (Rom_4:25). Now the cause being removed, the effect is removed. If, then, the resurrection of Christ is not a fact, neither is our justification from sins, and consequently we are still in our former sins.

Ver. 18.Then they also which are fallen asleep in Christ are perished, i.e., who have died in faith, hope, and charity. If the body is not to rise again, but perishes outright at death, the soul too will perish: it cannot exist for ever without the body, for its nature is the "form" of the body. Unless, then, God take away by violence from the soul its nature and natural condition, He must restore to it its body.

Ver. 19.If in this life only we have hope in Christ. 1. The word "hope" here signifies, not the act of hope, for this exists in this life only, but the object of hope or the thing hoped for. If our only hope in Christ is for the goods of this life, then are we the most miserable of men; we are the most foolish also, because we rely on an empty hope of the resurrection, which is never to happen, and suffer fastings, mortifications, persecutions, and other hardships, and we resign the pleasure of the world and the flesh which others indulge in. Although, then, we are more happy than they, because of the good that is the fruit of the virtue of abstinence, of charity, and of an unclouded conscience, yet we are more miserable than they, so far as our hope in Christ is concerned, nay, we are fools for relying on a baseless hope. So Anselm and Chrysostom. The Apostle does not say "we are worse," but "miserable;" for it is a miserable thing to afflict ourselves for virtue's sake, and yet not obtain the prize; but the prize of Christian virtue is the resurrection.

It may be said that the soul can have its reward and be blessed without its body rising again. My answer to this is: God might have so arranged things that the soul alone should be rewarded with the Beatific Vision, but He did not so will it. As a matter of fact He willed that if the soul be beatified, so shall the body; if the body is not, neither will the soul; otherwise Christ would not have completely overcome sin, which reigns by death over soul and body alike.

2. It was the opinion of men at that time that if the immortality of the soul be proved, the resurrection of the body must be at once admitted, because of the close connection between them. The soul has a natural longing after the body, and cannot exist without it unless by violence. Therefore the resurrection, so far as concerns the essence and the needs of human nature, is a natural process, though its mode of execution be supernatural. Nor can the soul when once separated be again united to the body by any created force, but only by the supernatural power of God. Paul, then, from the denial of the resurrection and happiness of the body, rightly infers, according to the common opinion of men, as well as the nature and truth of things, the denial of the immortality and bliss of the soul; and so it is no wonder if Christians are not to rise again, that they should be of all men most miserable.

Ver. 20.But now is Christ risen from the dead, and become the firstfruits of them that slept. (1.) Christ was and is the first of those that rise again, both in order of dignity and of merit. (2.) He was first in the Divine will and intention. (3.) First causally, for by Him we shall all rise again. (4.) Temporally, for Christ was the first in time to rise to everlasting life; for though some before Him were raised to life by Elijah and Elisha, yet they rose to this mortal life only, and again died; but Christ was the first to rise to the eternal life of bliss and glory. So Chrysostom, Anselm, Ambrose, Theophylact, Theodoret, and others. The word for firstfruits properly signifies this, and implies others to follow. So is Christ called the "first-begotten of the dead," i.e., rising before all others, and, as it were, being born again from the dead.

It seems from this to be a point de fide that no one rose before Christ to everlasting life. Those, therefore, who at the death of Christ are said to have arisen (S. Mat_27:52), rose after Him in the way of nature, if not of time, for their resurrection depended on Christ's as its cause. Francis Suarez points out this (p. 3. qu. 53, art. 3).

The earliest fruit of the earth, which under the Old Law was to be offered to God, was called the "firstfruits;" so Christ, after His resurrection, was offered to God as the firstfruits of the earth, into which He had been cast as a corn of wheat, and from which He sprang forth again in the new birth of the resurrection.

ver. 5).

2. If Christ is not risen, then the preaching of the Apostles and the faith of Christians are alike vain (

ver. 14).

3. If Christ is not risen, we are still in our sins. This is proved by the fact that faith that justifies and expiates our sins is the same by which we believe that Christ died and rose again for us (

ver. 17).

4. If Christ is not risen, then have ill perished who have fallen asleep in Christ, and have been destroyed both in body and soul; for the soul cannot live for ever without the body (

ver. 18).

5. If we serve Christ only in this short life, and under His law have no hope of resurrection, then are we of all men most miserable (

ver. 19).

6. By Adam all die, therefore through Christ shall all rise again, and be quickened. For Christ has done us as much good as Adam did harm: He came, not only that He might repair all the falls and loss of Adam and his descendants, but that He might lift us up to a higher state.(