✠ daily readings

jump to a date

readings are available from 2025-01-01 through 2027-12-31.

search

search by feast, season, or scripture reference.

type to search…

←
Lectionary 357 · Year II · Weekdays in Ordinary Time — Year II

Friday of the 9th week in Ordinary Time

→
USCCB ↗

First Reading · 2 Timothy 3:10-17

10But thou hast fully known my doctrine, manner of life, purpose, faith, longsuffering, love, patience,11Persecutions, afflictions: such as came upon me at Antioch, at Iconium and at Lystra: what persecutions I endured, and out of them all the Lord delivered me.12And all that will live godly in Christ Jesus shall suffer persecution.13But evil men and seducers shall grow worse and worse: erring, and driving into error,14But continue thou in those things which thou hast learned and which have been committed to thee. Knowing of whom thou hast learned them:15And because from thy infancy thou hast known the holy scriptures which can instruct thee to salvation by the faith which is in Christ Jesus.16All scripture, inspired of God, is profitable to teach, to reprove, to correct, to instruct in justice:17That the man of God may be perfect, furnished to every good work.

commentary

The Douay's which can instruct thee to salvation (v. 15) turns on a modal, and Witham will not let it slide past. The Scriptures, he writes, "are able, and may conduce or can instruct" Timothy — and then he supplies what the verse leaves implicit: "unto his own salvation and that of others." The same outward turn governs his paraphrase of the next verse. Where the Douay has to instruct in justice, Witham renders it "to instruct others in justice, and in the ways of virtue," and glosses the man of God of v. 17 as "a minister of the gospel." So the passage on his reading is not addressed to a reader in general. It is addressed to one man, whom Witham describes with deliberate accumulation: long since instructed in all the truths and mysteries of the Christian faith, gifted with the Holy Ghost, with prophecy, with the interpretation of the Scriptures, a priest, a bishop of Ephesus, "the metropolis of Asia," whose office was to instruct, direct, and convert others.

That identification is the whole hinge of Witham's argument, because he concedes the premise and refuses two conclusions drawn from it. He states them as the claims of "our adversaries of the pretended reformation": that any ignorant man or woman is warranted to put a private construction on the Scriptures, and that the Scriptures alone contain everything a Christian is bound to believe. Against the first he simply presses the addressee — does it follow that because Scripture must be read by Timothy, a bishop whose office is to instruct and convert others, it is therefore fit to be read and expounded by everyone? He reinforces the point from Paul's own admission at 2 Corinthians ii. 17 that many "adulterate and corrupt the word of God," and from 2 Peter iii. 16, that in Paul's epistles are things "which the unlearned and unstable wrest, as also the other scriptures, to their own perdition." Against the second he turns the argument's own instrument back on it: if Scripture is the entire rule, where does Scripture tell us that these two letters to Timothy are canonical? Haydock keeps the distinction crisp — Paul teaches with Catholics "that all Scripture is profitable; but not with Protestants, that Scripture alone is necessary and sufficient" — and Challoner gives it positive form. The Scriptures Timothy knew from infancy were the Old Testament alone; the rule of faith is neither those nor the New Testament by itself, but Scripture together with "the traditions of the apostles and the interpretation of the Church, to which the apostles delivered both the book and the true meaning of it."

What Haydock sees Paul entreating is that Timothy, "and in him all future Christians," adhere to the true deposit of doctrine. That is a harder thing than it sounds, and the modern failure runs in both directions. One kind of reader treats the text as a private possession that answers to no one, which is precisely the construction Witham says does not follow from the verse; another treats the Church's interpretation as a substitute for opening the book at all, when Challoner's point is that the apostles handed over the book and its meaning in one act. Verse 14 keeps both halves in view. Timothy is to continue in what he has learned — knowing of whom thou hast learned them. The knowledge is inseparable from the named people who delivered it, and the promise attached in v. 12 is not comfort but cost: all that will live godly in Christ Jesus shall suffer persecution.

· sources ·

The complete public-domain commentary this reading's note draws from, unabridged. Every claim in the note traces to a passage here.

First Reading 2 Timothy 3:10-17

Haydock Catholic Bible Commentary · Public Domain
3:14

But continue thou in the things which thou hast learned, &c. St. Paul here gives particular advice to his disciple, St. Timothy, who had been long since instructed in all the truths and mysteries of the Christian faith, who had received the gifts of the Holy Ghost, of prophecy, of interpreting the Scriptures, who was a priest, a bishop of Ephesus, the metropolis of Asia, whose office it was to instruct, direct, and convert others. He tells this great bishop, that the holy Scriptures are able, and may conduce or can instruct him unto salvation, (ver. 15.) unto his own salvation and that of others. (Witham) --- The apostle here entreats his disciple, an din him all future Christians, to adhere to the true deposit of doctrine. He teaches with Catholics, that all Scripture is profitable; but not with Protestants, that Scripture alone is necessary and sufficient.

3:16

All scripture divinely inspired is profitable to teach, to reprove, to correct, or admonish, to instruct others in justice, and in the ways of virtue, that thus he who is a man of God, a minister of the gospel, may be perfect and instructed unto every good work. But when our adversaries of the pretended reformation, undertake from these four verses to shew, first, that every ignorant man or woman is hereby warranted to read and put what construction his or her private spirit, or private judgment, suggests upon all places of the holy Scriptures; and secondly, that the Scriptures alone contain all truths which a Christian is bound to believe; or at least, that the Scriptures teach him all things necessary to salvation, without regard to the interpretation and authority of the Catholic Church: I may at least say (without examining at present any other pretended grounds of these assertions) that these consequences are very remote from the text and sense of St. Paul in this place. As to the first, does this follow; the Scriptures must be read by Timothy, a priest, a bishop, a man of God, a minister of the gospel, whose office it is to instruct and convert others, therefore they are proper to be read and expounded by every ignorant man or woman? Does not St. Paul say elsewhere, (2 Corinthians ii. 17.) that many adulterate and corrupt the word of God? does not St. Peter tell us also, (2 Peter iii. 16.) that in St. Paul's epistles are some things....which the unlearned and unstable wrest, as also the other scriptures, to their own perdition? See the preface to [the Gospel of] St. John, where reasons are brought for which it was requisite that the Church should put some restraint to the abuse which the ignorant made of reading the Scriptures in vulgar tongues. As to the second consequence, does it follow: every Scripture divinely inspired is profitable for St. Timothy, for a priest, a bishop, a man of God, a minister and preacher of the gospel, to teach and instruct, and conduce to bring both him and others to salvation; therefore they contain all things that a Christian need to believe? &c. Is not every Christian bound to believe that the books in the canon of the New and Old Testament are of divine authority, as in particular these two epistles of St. Paul to Timothy? Where does the Scripture assure us of this? But of this elsewhere. (Witham) --- Every part of divine Scripture is certainly profitable for all these ends. But if we would have the whole rule of Christian faith and practice, we must not be content with those Scriptures which Timothy knew from his infancy, (that is, with the Old Testament alone) nor yet with the New Testament, without taking along with it the traditions of the apostles and the interpretation of the Church, to which the apostles delivered both the book and the true meaning of it. (Challoner)