✠ daily readings

jump to a date

readings are available from 2025-01-01 through 2027-12-31.

search

search by feast, season, or scripture reference.

type to search…

←
Thu · May 13, 2027 · Eastertide

Our Lady of Fatima

→
USCCB ↗

First Reading · Acts 22:30; 23:6-11

Acts 22

30But on the next day, meaning to know more diligently for what cause he was accused by the Jews, he loosed him and commanded the priests to come together and all the council: and, bringing forth Paul, he set him before them.

Acts 23

6And Paul, knowing that the one part were Sadducees and the other Pharisees, cried out in the council: Men, brethren, I am a Pharisee, the son of Pharisees: concerning the hope and resurrection of the dead I am called in question.7And when he had so said, there arose a dissension between the Pharisees and the Sadducees. And the multitude was divided.8For the Sadducees say that there is no resurrection, neither angel, nor spirit: but the Pharisees confess both.9And there arose a great cry. And some of the Pharisees rising up, strove, saying: We find no evil in this man. What if a spirit hath spoken to him, or an angel?10And when there arose a great dissension, the tribune, fearing lest Paul should be pulled in pieces by them, commanded the soldiers to go down and to take him by force from among them and to bring him into the castle.11And the night following, the Lord standing by him, said: Be constant: for as thou hast testified of me in Jerusalem, so must thou bear witness also at Rome.

commentary

The sentence Paul shouts across the council rests on a manuscript split that Haydock records in his notes: "divers of the best Greek manuscripts" read the plural pharisaion, the son of Pharisees, while "the common Greek" has uios pharisaiou, son of a single Pharisee. Witham then removes even that ground: the phrase "may signify only a disciple of the Pharisees." So the claim on which Paul's whole tactic depends is ambiguous between a pedigree and a schooling — and it works either way, because what the council hears is a man declaring which side of the house he belongs to. Witham makes a second small point at v. 7. The word the Douay renders dissension is, "by the Greek, a division, or schism among them," and it is produced deliberately, "occasioned by St. Paul's declaring himself for the resurrection, which made the Pharisees favour him, and incensed the Sadducees."

Calmet does not flinch from what that means. "The address of the apostle in this is great. Knowing the different dispositions of his judges, he throws disunion into their councils, in order to draw himself from danger. Such innocent artifices are allowed in the defence of a just cause." He anchors the judgment first in the Saviour's counsel to use the prudence of the serpent, then in two authorities: Gregory, in the Moralia (lib. xxxiv, cc. 3-4), and Aquinas in the Summa (2-2, q. 37, a. 2), who hold that on similar occasions "you may, without sin, cause divisions among the wicked; because their union being an evil, it is consequently a good thing that the enemies of peace and righteousness should be divided in sentiments and interests." And then Calmet fences his own conclusion before anyone else can: "it must, however, be acknowledged that this principle is very easily stretched beyond its proper limits, and therefore ought not to be acted upon but with the greatest caution and prudence." The permission is real; the warning is that it is unusually easy to help oneself to.

The night vision closes the argument from the other side. Haydock notes that Paul "knew from divine revelation that he was to go to Rome; but this did not hinder the apostle from taking every prudent care of his own life," and points forward to the following chapter for the proof. Witham's gloss on the Lord's words is almost brusque — so must thou bear witness also at Rome, "and so needest not fear to be killed by them." Certainty about the ending is not a dispensation from acting; it is what makes acting worth the trouble. Both errors the passage rebukes are still available: the piety that treats a settled providence as a reason to go slack, and the shrewdness Calmet warns of, which hears "in defence of a just cause" and stops reading. What the text holds together it holds in one night — soldiers sent down to pull a man out of a body tearing itself in half over him, and the Lord standing by him in the dark afterwards, saying be constant.

· sources ·

The complete public-domain commentary this reading's note draws from, unabridged. Every claim in the note traces to a passage here.

First Reading Acts 22:30; 23:6-11

Haydock Catholic Bible Commentary · Public Domain
23:6 · bibliography — editions & variants cited above

I am a Pharisee, the son of Pharisees.[2] It may signify only a disciple of the Pharisees, though the common Greek copies have of a Pharisee. (Witham) --- The address of the apostle in this is great. Knowing the different dispositions of his judges, he throws disunion into their councils, in order to draw himself from danger. Such innocent artifices are allowed in the defence of a just cause. It is one of our Saviour's counsels, to use the prudence of the serpent. St. Gregory, in his Morality, (lib. xxxiv. cap. 3. and 4.) and St. Thomas Aquinas in his Sum. Theol. (2. 2. quæst. 37. art. 2.) observe, that on similar occasions you may, without sin, cause divisions among the wicked; because their union being an evil, it is consequently a good thing that the enemies of peace and righteousness should be divided in sentiments and interests. It must, however, be acknowledged that this principle is very easily stretched beyond its proper limits, and therefore ought not to be acted upon but with the greatest caution and prudence. (Calmet) --- St. Paul knew from divine revelation that he was to go to Rome; but this did not hinder the apostle from taking every prudent care of his own life; as we may see from the following chapter.

Filius Parisæorum; and so divers of the best Greek manuscripts Greek: pharisaion; but the common Greek, Greek: uios pharisaiou.

23:7

There arose a dissension. By the Greek, a division, or schism among them, occasioned by St. Paul's declaring himself for the resurrection, which made the Pharisees favour him, and incensed the Sadducees. (Witham)

23:11

Be constant...so must thou bear witness also at Rome; and so needest not fear to be killed by them. (Witham)