✠ daily readings

jump to a date

readings are available from 2025-01-01 through 2027-12-31.

search

search by feast, season, or scripture reference.

type to search…

←
Mon · May 10, 2027 · Eastertide

Monday of the 7th week of Easter

→
USCCB ↗

First Reading · Acts 19:1-8

1And it came to pass, while Apollo was at Corinth, that Paul, having passed through the upper coasts, came to Ephesus and found certain disciples.2And he said to them: Have you received the Holy Ghost since ye believed? But they said to him: We have not so much as heard whether there be a Holy Ghost.3And he said: In what then were you baptized? Who said: In John's baptism.4Then Paul said: John baptized the people with the baptism of penance saying: That they should believe in him, who was to come after him, that is to say, in Jesus.5Having heard these things, they were baptized in the name of the Lord Jesus.6And when Paul had imposed his hands on them, the Holy Ghost came upon them: and they spoke with tongues and prophesied.7And all the men were about twelve.8And entering into the synagogue, he spoke boldly for the space of three months, disputing and exhorting concerning the kingdom of God.

commentary

The sentence readers stumble on is v. 2 — We have not so much as heard whether there be a Holy Ghost — and Calmet declines to read it flatly. Their answer, he says, is probably not to be interpreted with rigour, since they must have heard something of the Holy Spirit, so often mentioned in the Old Testament, by whom the prophets are said to speak. What they meant was narrower: they did not know there was in the Church any means of communicating this Spirit to the faithful. The gap is not ignorance of a person but ignorance of a rite. That fits what Calmet takes them to be — apparently disciples of John the Baptist (v. 1), who had believed in Christ on John's testimony and had received no further instruction, nor any baptism but John's. Paul's opening question is correspondingly precise: Calmet reads it as an inquiry whether they had received the Holy Ghost by confirmation.

Witham handles the two verses where the rites are named, and both of his notes head off an obvious misreading. At v. 5 the phrase baptized in the name of the Lord Jesus looks like a rival formula to the one Christ commanded on the mountain in Galilee; Witham answers that it is a label rather than a form — so called to distinguish it from the baptism of John, while the baptism of Christ itself was given in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost, according to Christ's own command in Matthew. At v. 6 the imposition of hands is not a blessing appended to the washing but a second thing entirely: by that imposition, Witham says, the Holy Ghost was given in the sacrament of confirmation. Two rites, two moments. Which is what makes Paul's question intelligible in the first place — he asked it because he could see that one of the two had happened and the other had not.

The commentary the pipeline holds for this passage is four short notes from Calmet and Witham, and they pull in one direction: what these men lacked was not sincerity but the Church's ordinary means. The live version of their condition is the assumption that a decision, once made, is the whole of the matter — that having believed on good testimony, as they had, there is nothing further to be received from anyone. Paul never questions their belief. He asks instead what they were baptized into, and then supplies what was missing, in order and by hand. About twelve men, Luke notes almost in passing (v. 7), and afterwards a synagogue argued with for three months. The tongues and the prophesying came when hands were laid on them, not when they first believed John.

· sources ·

The complete public-domain commentary this reading's note draws from, unabridged. Every claim in the note traces to a passage here.

First Reading Acts 19:1-8

Haydock Catholic Bible Commentary · Public Domain
19:1

Disciples. These were apparently disciples of St. John the Baptist, who believed in Christ from his testimony, and had received no farther instruction, nor any baptism but John's. (Calmet)

19:2

St. Paul first inquires of them, if they have received the Holy Ghost by confirmation. Their answer is probably not to be interpreted with rigour; since they must have heard something of the holy Spirit, so often mentioned in the Old Testament, by whom the prophets are said to speak, &c. They meant, they did not know there was in the Church, any means of communicating this Spirit to the faithful. (Calmet)

19:5

Baptized in the name of the Lord Jesus, so called to distinguish it from the baptism of John; and that of Christ was given in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost, according to the command of Christ himself. [Matthew xxviii. 19.] (Witham)

19:6

Imposed his hands on them, by which imposition of hands, was given the Holy Ghost in the sacrament of confirmation. (Witham)