✠ daily readings

jump to a date

readings are available from 2025-01-01 through 2027-12-31.

search

search by feast, season, or scripture reference.

type to search…

←
Mon · May 3, 2027 · Eastertide

Saints Philip and James, Apostles

→
USCCB ↗

First Reading · 1 Corinthians 15:1-8

1Now I make known unto you, brethren, the gospel which I preached to you, which also you have received and wherein you stand.2By which also you are saved, if you hold fast after what manner I preached unto you, unless you have believed in vain.3For I delivered unto you first of all, which I also received: how that Christ died for our sins, according to the scriptures:4And that he was buried: and that he rose again on the third day according to the scriptures:5And that he was seen by Cephas, and after that by the eleven.6Then was he seen by more than five hundred brethren at once: of whom many remain until this present, and some are fallen asleep.7After that, he was seen by James: then by all the apostles.8And last of all, he was seen also by me, as by one born out of due tine.

commentary

Paul's list of witnesses has a small puzzle in it. He says Christ was seen by Cephas, and after that by the eleven (v. 5), but Lapide reports that the Greek copies read "then of the twelve," and that Augustine had the same reading. Augustine explains it as a corporate name kept after Judas's death, as the Decemvirs were said to assemble when only seven or eight were present. Chrysostom proposed instead that the twelfth was Matthias, seen after the ascension, which Lapide rejects because nothing records it and Paul is listing appearances before the ascension. The rest of the list climbs in number and then narrows: more than five hundred brethren at once, many still living (v. 6), then James, then all the apostles, and last of all ... me, as by one born out of due time (v. 8). Paul calls all of it something received and delivered (v. 3).

Lapide collects six readings of "born out of due time." Theophylact and Theodoret hear contempt, since untimely young are generally imperfect and undersized. Ambrose and Chrysostom hear lateness, an apostle born in Christ after the ascension, and Witham in Haydock combines the two: the term means Paul came after Christ's ascension and is used out of humility, "abortives being commonly imperfect and less than others." Anselm adds violence, a birth forced by divine power, and notes that such births are often blind, as Paul was at his conversion. Lapide rejects Baronius's idea of a senator co-opted beyond the fixed number, since Paul was writing in Greek to Greeks, not to Romans. He concludes that Christ appeared to Paul in person, "in the air in bodily form," as to Cephas and James, because "if it were any other kind of appearance it would be no proof of the resurrection." On James, Lapide dismisses the story of a vow not to eat until he saw the risen Christ, which Jerome took from the apocryphal Gospel according to the Hebrews and himself thought of no value.

The passage asks the Corinthians to hold fast after what manner I preached (v. 2), unless you have believed in vain. Lapide treats the chapter as a proof against false teachers who denied the resurrection, and the proof is a roll of names and numbers, many of them still alive when he wrote. That cuts against any faith content with a resurrection of meaning without a body seen, and against a private Christianity that has no use for a tradition handed on. Lapide notes that Christ appeared to Peter first among men, and the apostle's list ends with the persecutor seeing him last, at his conversion, in the moment before the light blinded him.

· sources ·

The complete public-domain commentary this reading's note draws from, unabridged. Every claim in the note traces to a passage here.

First Reading 1 Corinthians 15:1-8

The Great Biblical Commentary of Cornelius a Lapide · Public Domain
15:1–13

CHAPTER 15

SYNOPSIS OF THE CHAPTER

He proves the resurrection of the dead against the false teachers who denied it:

i. From the fact of Christ's resurrection. Thus (

Ver. 1.I declare unto you, i.e., recall to your memory.

Vers. 3, 4.How that Christ died for our sins . . . according to the scriptures. Hos_6:2: "After two days will He revive us; in the third day He will raise us up," i.e., when He shall on the third day Himself rise from death to life; for the resurrection of Christ was the cause of our rising from the death of sin, and of our future resurrection from bodily death, so that we are to rise like Christ on the Judgment Day to everlasting life. See notes on Rom_4:25. So Anselm, Dorotheus, in the beginning of his Synopsis, and also the Jewish writers of old in Galatin. lib. viii. c. 22. Theophylact, following S. Chrysostom, says that it was prophesied under an allegory that Christ should rise again on the third day; for Jonah brought from the whale's belly on the third day, was a type of Christ brought back to life from death and hell on the third day.

Isaac, too, typified the same event in his being rescued from death when about to be sacrificed by his father, and restored to his mother alive and well on the third day. So Christ was given by His Father and sacrificed, and raised again on the third day. But these two instances are drawn from the allegorical sense, that of Hosea is from the literal.

Ver. 5.Was seen of Cephas. Paul puts this appearance of Christ first, and therefore implies that the first man that Christ appeared to was Peter. I say "the first man," for He appeared to the Magdalene before S. Peter (S. Mar_16:9).

Then of the eleven. On the Sunday after the resurrection, when Thomas was now present, Christ appeared to the eleven, for the twelfth, Judas, had by that time hanged himself, or better still, "to the eleven," i.e., to the whole Apostolic College, which then had been reduced to eleven, Christ appeared on the day of His resurrection, though Thomas was absent. The Greek copies have, "then of the twelve." S. Augustine has the same reading (Quæst. Evangel lib. i. qu. 117), and he says there that, though Judas was dead, "the twelve" were still so called as by a corporate name. So the Decemvirs are said to assemble if only seven or eight are present. Chrysostom explains it otherwise. He says that Christ appeared to the twelfth, Matthias, after His ascension. But this is not recorded anywhere, and Paul is here naming the appearances of Christ before His ascension only.

Ver. 6.After that He was seen of above five hundred brethren. The Greek word for above means (a) "more than," (b) "from heaven." Chrysostom and Theophylact take it here in the latter sense. For Christ appeared, they say, not walking on the ground, but above their heads, as though descending from the sky; and He did this that He might show them that He had ascended as well as risen, and might confirm their faith in His ascension. Hence any one may gather that Chrysostom thought that this appearance of Christ took place after His Ascension; but still it is not true, nor is of necessity gathered from what Chrysostom says.

This appearance of Christ, whether on a higher spot, as if from heaven, or in the air, evidently was prior to His ascension; and this is the common opinion of doctors; for we read nowhere of any public appearance after His ascension.

Many suppose that this was the well-known appearance of Christ on a mountain in Galilee, which He had so many times promised. All His disciples met there, as He had bidden. This was not at His ascension, but before it; for Christ ascended into heaven, not from Galilee, but from the Mount of Olives. See S. Jerome (ad Hedibiam, qu. 7).

Ver. 7.After that He was seen of James. The son of Alphæus, first Bishop of Jerusalem, and styled brother of the Lord. There is a tradition mentioned by Jerome (Lib. de Scrip. Eccles. in Jacobo) that James had taken a vow not to eat anything till he should see Christ risen. S. Jerome, however, does not think the tradition of any value. Its falsity is seen, too, (1.) for it is evident, from this passage of S. Paul, that Christ appeared to him after appearing to the five hundred brethren, and therefore long after His resurrection, too long for S. James's fast to have been prolonged naturally. (2.) All the Apostles, and therefore S. James, were confounded at Christ's death, and did not believe in His resurrection. It is not likely then that James would take such a vow. (3.)  S. Jerome says that he took this story from the "Gospel according to the Hebrews," which is apocryphal. It is also said there that Christ wore at the time a linen garment, and that He gave it to the servant of the priest, which also seems false; for the garments of Christ remained in the sepulchre (S. Matt. xxviii.), and a glorified body, such as Christ's was, is not clad with linen or any such garments, but with splendour and rays of light.

Then of all the apostles, and the disciples as well, says S. Anselm, at the ascension.

Ver. 8.And last of all Ale was seen of me also, as of one born out of due time. Born out of due time is, (1.) according to Theophylact and Theodoret, contemptible and despised, because young that come too soon to the birth are generally imperfectly formed, thin, and undersized. (2.) According to Ambrose and Chrysostom it is untimely; that is, after Christ had ascended into heaven, Paul was born in Christ and received his Apostleship. (3.) According to Anselm he thus calls himself, because he was struck to the earth by Divine power, compelled, and violently born again: untimely young are forced into the world by the violence of nature. (4.) Or, as S. Anselm again remarks, such births are of young half-dead, and they are often born blind. So S. Paul was smitten with blindness at his conversion. (5.)  S. Paul was expelled from the womb of his mother, the people of the Jews, and was sent, not to his fellow-countrymen, but to the Gentiles outside. (6.) Baronius (Annals, A.D. 44) thinks that Paul was so called as an Apostle, because he was made an Apostle in addition to the twelve; for the Senators at Rome, he says, were so called, when they were co-opted into the Senate, in addition to the fixed number; but it cannot be said that S. Paul alludes to this, for he is writing in Greek to the Greeks, not to Romans.

It appears from this verse that Christ appeared to Paul, not by an angel, as Haymo thinks (Comment. on Apocalypse, c. ii.), but in person; not in a vision, as He appeared to him in Acts xxii. 18, nor in a trance, as is recorded in 2 Cor. xii. 2, but in the air in bodily form; for it was in this way that Christ appeared to Cephas, James, and the other Apostles; moreover, if it were any other kind of appearance it would be no proof of the resurrection of Christ. The appearance of Christ alluded to here is the one at Paul's conversion (Acts ix. 3), when he saw Christ before the bright light blinded him.

Hence it further appears that Christ then descended from heaven, for, as S. Thomas and others say, S. Paul heard the voice of Christ speaking in the air. Whence it follows again that Christ was then in two places, in the empyrean and in our atmosphere, close to Paul; for, according to Acts iii. 21, Christ has never left the highest heaven to which He ascended. If Christ was then in two places, why cannot He be at once in heaven and in the Eucharist?

Hegesippus (Excid. Hierosol. lib, iii. c. 2) and others say that Christ appeared in the same way to S. Peter at Rome, when He called him back as he was flying from martyrdom with the words, "I go to be crucified again."

ver. 3, preach and affirm as eye-witnesses, viz., that Christ died, and rose from the dead, and appeared to us. The Apostle returns here, as if after a long digression, to the point of the whole chapter, which is to prove, from the unanimous testimony of the Apostles, the resurrection of Christ, and of the rest who have died.

ver. 5).

2. If Christ is not risen, then the preaching of the Apostles and the faith of Christians are alike vain (