✠ daily readings

jump to a date

readings are available from 2025-01-01 through 2027-12-31.

search

search by feast, season, or scripture reference.

type to search…

←
Thu · Apr 8, 2027 · Eastertide

Thursday of the 2nd week of Easter

→
USCCB ↗

First Reading · Acts 5:27-33

27And when they had brought them, they set them before the council. And the high priest asked them,28Saying: Commanding, we commanded you that you should not teach in this name. And behold, you have filled Jerusalem with your doctrine: and you have a mind to bring the blood of this man upon us.29But Peter and the apostles answering, said: We ought to obey God rather than men.30The God of our fathers hath raised up Jesus, whom you put to death, hanging him upon a tree.31Him hath God exalted with his right hand, to be Prince and Saviour. to give repentance to Israel and remission of sins.32And we are witnesses of these things: and the Holy Ghost, whom God hath given to all that obey him.33When they had heard these things, they were cut to the heart: and they thought to put them to death.

commentary

The council opens with a doubled verb the Douay declines to smooth: Commanding, we commanded you that you should not teach in this name (v. 28). Haydock's apparatus flattens it into its force — "that is, charged you severely" — and the sentence is careful in another way too, since the high priest will say this name and this man but not Jesus. What he does say plainly is the fear underneath the injunction: you have a mind to bring the blood of this man upon us, which Witham glosses as "you will make us pass for guilty of the murder of the Messias." The complaint is not that the apostles teach falsehood. It is that their teaching assigns liability. The same exactness returns at the close, where the Douay's cut to the heart (v. 33) stands for the Vulgate's dissecabantur; the Greek the apparatus records is dieprionto, which Arias Montanus renders more bluntly as furebant — they raged. Witham reads it the same way: "exasperated to fury and madness."

Peter's reply, Witham notes, is given boldly, and it refuses to stay on the ground the council has chosen. We ought to obey God rather than men (v. 29) would have been a sufficient answer to the charge; instead Peter, in Witham's summary, "withal adds" the whole substance of the preaching — that God had raised from death Jesus, the Prince and Saviour of mankind, by whose merits all might find repentance and forgiveness of their sins, and that the apostles are witnesses of his resurrection. The refusal and the testimony are one act. And the testimony answers the blood question in the only way that would help the men asking it: the exalted Christ is given to give repentance to Israel and remission of sins (v. 31). Those who dread being made guilty of the Messias's death are offered, by the prisoners in front of them, remission for precisely that.

What the council cannot do is treat the claim as a claim. It hears that a man it condemned is alive and exalted, and its first thought is about its own exposure — how the verdict will look, who will be blamed. The modern form of that reflex is familiar enough: a question of fact about Christ handled as a question of reputational damage, of what conceding would cost. The passage does not let the two stay separate, because Peter's answer to the liability is an offer of pardon, which can only be accepted by someone willing first to admit that the charge is true. The alternative is what the chapter actually records — men who have just been told they may be forgiven, cut to the heart and past argument — furebant — and already deciding how to kill the witnesses.

· sources ·

The complete public-domain commentary this reading's note draws from, unabridged. Every claim in the note traces to a passage here.

First Reading Acts 5:27-33

Haydock Catholic Bible Commentary · Public Domain
5:28

Commanding, we commanded you. That is, charged you severely. --- You have a mind to bring the blood of this man upon us. You will make us pass for guilty of the murder of the Messias. (Witham)

5:29

Peter answered boldly, We ought to obey God, rather than men. And withal adds, that God had raised from death Jesus, the Prince and Saviour of mankind, by whose merits all might find repentance, and forgiveness of their sins; that they were witness of his resurrection, &c. (Witham)

5:33 · bibliography — editions & variants cited above

They were cut to the heart;[5] exasperated to fury and madness, and were for killing them. (Witham)

Dissecabantur. Greek: dieprionto; which Arias Montanus translates furebant.