✠ daily readings

jump to a date

readings are available from 2025-01-01 through 2026-12-31.

search

search by feast, season, or scripture reference.

type to search…

←
Mon · Aug 31, 2026 · Ordinary Time

Monday of the 22nd week of Ordinary Time

→
USCCB ↗

First Reading · 1 Corinthians 2:1-5

1And I, brethren, when I came to you, came not in loftiness of speech or of wisdom, declaring unto you the testimony of Christ.2For I judged not myself to know anything among you, but Jesus Christ: and him crucified.3And I was with you in weakness and in fear and in much trembling.4And my speech and my preaching was not in the persuasive words of human wisdom. but in shewing of the Spirit and power:5That your faith might not stand on the wisdom of men, but on the power of God.

commentary

Paul names two things in v. 4 and the distinction is not decorative. Lapide, following Aquinas and the Glossa, takes logos — "my speech" — as private, familiar conversation, set against the public preaching named beside it; and he reaches for Seneca to explain why both had to be disclaimed. Conversation, Seneca says, works on the mind little by little and is therefore of immense force, while speeches composed for a large assembly have more vehemence and less familiarity. Paul is renouncing not just the pulpit manner but the persuasive touch of ordinary talk. The other word worth pausing on is in v. 2. Lapide underlines determined: this was a policy, adopted and held, not a limitation. Paul had the equipment — he quotes the Greek poets elsewhere — and at Corinth he put it away.

Anselm draws out what "Him crucified" was meant to do beyond furnishing a doctrine: the cross is imitated, and the vices are what get crucified. Lapide makes the correspondence exact. Christ chose utmost pain, utmost poverty and the lowest depth of shame, and these crucify respectively the lust of the flesh, the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life — the three heads under which the world's sin is gathered. This is also why the weakness of v. 3 is not a rhetorical concession. Chrysostom and Anselm note that Paul regularly uses weakness for the anxiety produced by plots, exile, calumny and daily terror, and Lapide points out how well attested the Corinthian instance is: Paul had to be strengthened there by Christ in a vision, and the Jews soon dragged him before Gallio and beat Sosthenes in open court. Chrysostom refuses to let this diminish him — fear of torment is natural to every man, and the admirable thing is an apostle who was afraid, exposed himself anyway, and kept winning. Theophylact hears v. 3 as Paul's own account of the method's origin: daily affronts left him no leisure for elegant harangues. What replaced eloquence, Witham says, was the visible gift of the Spirit and the miracles God worked, and Œcumenius states the principle flatly — a demonstration by works and signs is surer than one resting on words. Origen agrees that Christian teaching has its own proper demonstration, more divine than the Greek kind, but he assigns the parts differently: the Spirit gives credit to the prophets' testimony about Christ, and the power is seen in the miracles. Augustine's confession is the plainest of them: I will never rely on wisdom of words, lest the Cross of Christ be shorn of its power.

Theodoret supplies the reason it matters, and it is a forensic one. Had Paul used subtleties and eloquence, someone could reasonably allege that the Corinthians were talked into their faith by artifice; as it stands, no such account of them is available. The modern versions of the temptation are more sophisticated than rhetoric and harder to see: the message tuned for the platform it will travel on, the argument selected for what it will do to an audience rather than for being true, the preacher measuring himself by whether people liked it. Jerome's instruction to Nepotianus is the corrective, and it is uncomfortably concrete. Let your teaching in church raise not the applause of the congregation but their groaning, and take the tears of the hearers as the proof that you have succeeded.

· sources ·

The complete public-domain commentary this reading's note draws from, unabridged. Every claim in the note traces to a passage here.

First Reading 1 Corinthians 2:1-5

The Great Biblical Commentary of Cornelius a Lapide · Public Domain
2:1–13

CHAPTER II.

SYNOPSIS OF THE CHAPTER

He proceeds to exalt the spiritual wisdom of Christ above all natural and animal wisdom. Therefore he says:

i. That he knew and preached nothing but Christ crucified; and that not with enticing words of man's wisdom, but in demonstration of the Spirit and of power.

ii. Nevertheless in

ver. 5 he says that he speaks wisdom among them that are perfect, wisdom hidden from the world, which eye hath not seen nor ear heard, but which the Spirit of God alone has revealed.

iii. He shows in

Ver. 1.And I, brethren, when I came to you, came not with excellency of speech or of wisdom. The Apostle here descends from the general to the particular. In other words: I said in the preceding chapter that God in preaching the Gospel willed not to use the wisdom of the wise in this world, but rejected it and scorned it, but willed by the foolishness of preaching to save them that believe; and therefore He chose not many noble or wise to spread the Gospel, but the low-born and untaught Apostles. From this I infer and say "And I" i.e., and so I as one of the number of the Apostles, who, according to the election and will of God, did not use eloquence and worldly wisdom, was unwilling to use those means, and I came to you not in excellency but in simplicity of speech and wisdom.

Ver. 2.For I determined not to know anything among you save Jesus Christ and Him crucified. Mark the word determined: it is as if he said, I did not think of, I did not value any knowledge save that which is of Jesus crucified, our Saviour, and, therefore, I so bore myself among you, as if I knew nothing of human wisdom, although I have much acquaintance with it, for on other occasions I can quote the Greek poets; but with you I kept it back, that like the others I might merely preach with all simplicity Christ crucified. Not that I did not preach the other mysteries of the faith, but I especially taught you and impressed on you that we must glory in the Cross of Christ only, and hope from it for our righteousness and salvation, and, as Anselm says, must imitate the cross and crucify our vices. For in Christ crucified it is easy to see, besides other things, that Christ chose and embraced these three, viz., utmost pain, the greatest poverty or nakedness, and the lowest depths of shame. Christ by His pains crucified and taught us to crucify the lust of the flesh; by His poverty He crucified the lust of the eyes or avarice; and by His shame He crucified the pride of life. These are the three heads of the world's sin, and the sources of all sins. (See 1 S. John ii. 16, and what was said about the Cross in c. i. 23).

Ver. 3.And I was with you in weakness: that is, in anxieties, tribulation, and persecution; and in fear and much trembling, because of the hostility of the persecuting Jews and Gentiles.  S. Chrysostom and Anselm remark that the Apostle in his Second Epistle (xi. 30 and xii. 5, 9, 10), and elsewhere, gives the name of weakness to the anxiety he suffered from dangers, plots, exile, daily terrors, calumnies, and hatreds. And also, that Paul suffered great anxieties and persecutions at Corinth, is evident in that he needed to be strengthened against them by Christ in a vision (Acts xviii. 9). Moreover, shortly afterwards the Jews there stirred up a tumult against Paul, and dragged him to the judgmentseat of Gallio, the deputy of Achaia, and publicly beat Sosthenes, the chief ruler of the synagogue, before him.

Ver. 4.And my speech and my preaching was not with enticing words of man's wisdom,, but in demonstration of the Spirit and of power. Speech (λόγος) denotes his private and familiar conversation as contrasted with his public preaching.  S. Thomas and the Glossa distinguished the two words in this way; so does Seneca, who, in Ep. 38, says: "Conversation, because it makes an impression on the mind by little and little, is of immense force. Speeches prepared and delivered to a large assembly have more vehemence but less familiarity." S. Paul's conversation, then, as well as his preaching, was not with enticing words (i.e., apt to persuade) of man's wisdom. In such the orators and philosophers at Corinth surpassed Paul. Paul, however, had to make the Corinthians believe a new philosophy by a new mode of speech and action, and in this he excelled all orators and philosophers, viz., in demonstration of the Spirit and of power. So Sulpicius testifies that S. Martin once said that "the kingdom is not founded on eloquence but on faith." S, Augustine, too, in his Sermon 1, about those coming to grace, says: "We do not try to persuade you with thundering words and flowery phrases, nor by any rhetorical skill, nor by eloquence darkened by set speeches such as the world uses, but we preach Christ crucified." And in lib. ii. c. ii., against Felicianus, he says: "I will never rely on wisdom of words, lest the Cross of Christ be shorn of its power; but I am content to rely on the authority of the Scriptures, and I am more anxious to obey simplicity than presumption."

This, then, was the demonstration of the Apostles, viz., to show (1.) burning zeal and a spirit giving forth wisdom and revealing secrets, not human but Divine, so that the hearers might perceive plainly that the Holy Spirit was speaking by their mouth; (2.) great powers, that is prodigies and miracles. Therefore Origen (lib. i. contra Celsum) says: "Our mode of teaching has its own proper demonstration, which is more Divine than that of the Greeks, and which is called by the Apostle, 'the demonstration of the Spirit and of power.' The Spirit lends faith to those things which are said about Christ in the Prophets; and the power is seen in the miracles which we believe to have been wrought." Origen here understands the work of the Spirit somewhat differently, but his explanation is not so much to the point as the one given above. For, as Œcumenius says, "The demonstration which comes by works and signs is surer than that which depends on words." This was the Apostolical mode of preaching, and a far more effectual way than that which modern preachers put before themselves for imitation. Their style was not adorned, clouded over, and tainted with enticing words of man's wisdom, but was in demonstration of the Spirit and of power. So will Apostolic men go forth, and their words, like fiery arrows, will pierce men's hearts, and like hammers break in pieces the rocks. Listen to S. Jerome (Ep. ii. to Nepotianus): "Let not the applause of the congregation be aroused by your teaching in church, but their groanings. Let the tears of the hearers be the proofs of your success." This spirit, as well as the fruit of preaching, must be obtained by prayer to God. Hence Origen (contra Celsum, lib. vi.), in quoting these same words of the Apostle, says "What else is the meaning of these words but that it is not enough that what we say is true and fit to stir the hearts of men? the teacher must have a certain power given him from above, and his words require the energy of Divine grace, as David says, 'The Lord shall give the word to those that preach with much power'" (Ps. lxvii. Vulg.).

Ver. 5.That your faith should not stand in the wisdom of men but in the power of God. Our preaching is to be of the kind just mentioned, so that your faith, i.e., your conversion to the faith of Christ, may not be attributed to human wisdom and eloquence but to the power and working of God. Your faith must be based on God's wisdom not on man's. (Anselm and others.)