✠ daily readings

jump to a date

readings are available from 2025-01-01 through 2026-12-31.

search

search by feast, season, or scripture reference.

type to search…

←
Sun · Aug 9, 2026 · Ordinary Time

19th Sunday of Ordinary Time

→
USCCB ↗

First Reading · 1 Kings 19:9a, 11-13

9And when he was come thither, he abode in a cave. and behold the word of the Lord came unto him, and he said to him: What dost thou here, Elias?11And he said to him: Go forth, and stand upon the mount before the Lord: and behold the Lord passeth, and a great and strong wind before the Lord, overthrowing the mountains, and breaking the rocks in pieces: but the Lord is not in the wind. And after the wind, an earthquake: but the Lord is not in the earthquake.12And after the earthquake, a fire: but the Lord is not in the fire. And after the fire, a whistling of a gentle air.13And when Elias heard it, he covered his face with his mantle, and coming forth, stood in the entering in of the cave, and behold a voice unto him, saying: What dost thou here, Elias? And he answered:

commentary

Elias is asked the same question twice, and the second asking is the point. "What dost thou here, Elias?" reaches him inside the cave (v. 9), and again at its mouth after the wind, the earthquake and the fire have gone by (v. 13). Nothing in the words has changed; only the man who hears them. Between the two askings stands a triple refusal — the Lord is not in the wind that overthrows mountains and breaks rocks, not in the earthquake, not in the fire — and then the Douay's a whistling of a gentle air. Tertullian, arguing the same God against Marcion, describes that arrival as est teneræ serenitatis, apertus et simplex, of a tender serenity, open and plain. What Elias does next is equally physical: he covers his face with his mantle. Menochius sets the gesture beside Moses hiding his face at the bush (Exodus iii. 6) and the cherubim veiling themselves with their wings (Isaias vi. 2); Calmet adds that among the Orientals covering the face carries the sense our uncovering the head does.

Why the theophany takes this shape is where the commentators divide the work. Menochius, on "behold the Lord passeth," takes the one passing to be the angel who stands as God's representative, and notes that the same favour had been granted to Moses in this same place (Exodus xxxiii. 21) — Horeb is not a neutral setting but the mountain of the law. Grotius makes that the key: something similar happened both at the giving of the law and at the propagation of the gospel (Exodus xix. 9, 16; Acts ii. 2), and the Lord was pleased to show his prophet the difference between the two laws, "the one full of terror, the other of mildness." Tirinus reads the scene as an argument about restraint rather than revelation — the wind, quake and fire display what God could easily do to the offenders, and his refusal to be in any of them shows that he chooses to bear with them. Sanctius, whom Calmet follows, turns the lesson on the prophet: Elias is being taught to moderate his zeal, and, having terrified sinners, to bring them to a sense of their duty by gentle means. That is what makes the repeated question sting. Menochius has already diagnosed the flight — Elias had been guided by a natural fear — and Tirinus supplies the answer he is given, which is not consolation but an assignment: thy presence is necessary in Israel. Tertullian's exclamation, "with how great familiarity is he received by God," is not sentiment; the familiarity consists in being corrected and sent back.

The error named here is not unbelief but misidentification: the assumption that God is found in whatever is largest and most destructive, and that zeal for him is measured by the noise it makes. Sanctius's reading is the hard one, because it does not tell the zealous man he was wrong about the offenders. It tells him that terror opens the work and does not finish it, and that whatever follows must be mild or it is not God's. Menochius's diagnosis deserves equal attention: what drove the prophet into the cave was a natural fear, and fear can be entirely devout and still be the reason a man has stopped doing his work. The image to keep is not the shattered rocks but the one the passage ends on — a man in the entrance of a cave with his cloak over his face, close enough to hear a whisper, and going back down the mountain because of it.

· sources ·

The complete public-domain commentary this reading's note draws from, unabridged. Every claim in the note traces to a passage here.

First Reading 1 Kings 19:9a, 11-13

Haydock Catholic Bible Commentary · Public Domain
19:9

Here. Thy presence is necessary in Israel. (Tirinus) --- Elias had been guided by a natural fear. (Menochius) --- "With how great familiarity is he received by God!" (Tertullian, contra Psychic. vi.)

19:11

Lord; the angel, his representative. (Menochius) --- God had formerly granted the like favour to Moses, in the same place, Exodus xxxiii. 21.

19:12

Air. Something similar happened at the giving of the law, and at the propagation of the gospel, Exodus xix 9, 16., and Acts ii. 2. The Lord was pleased to shew his prophet the difference between the two laws: the own was full of terror, the other of mildness. (Grotius) --- He insinuated likewise, that he could easily exterminate the offenders, but he chose to bear patiently with them; (Tirinus) and taught his prophet to moderate his zeal, and, after terrifying sinners, to being them to a sense of their duty by gentle means. (Sanctius) (Calmet) --- "His spirit is most indulgent and mild." ....est teneræ serenitatis, apertus et simplex. (Tertullian, contra Marcion xxiii.)

19:13

Mantle, out of respect, like Moses, Exodus iii. 6. So the cherubim veil their faces with their wings, Isaias vi. 2. (Menochius) --- Among the Orientals, to cover the face has the same import as when we pull of our hats. (Calmet)