✠ daily readings

jump to a date

readings are available from 2025-01-01 through 2026-12-31.

search

search by feast, season, or scripture reference.

type to search…

←
Thu · May 14, 2026 · Eastertide

Ascension of the Lord

→
USCCB ↗

First Reading · Acts 1:1-11

1The former treatise I made, O Theophilus, of all things which Jesus began to do and to teach,2Until the day on which, giving commandments by the Holy Ghost to the apostles whom he had chosen, he was taken up.3To whom also he shewed himself alive after his passion, by many proofs, for forty days appearing to them, and speaking of the kingdom of God.4And eating together with them, he commanded them, that they should not depart from Jerusalem, but should wait for the promise of the Father, which you have heard (saith he) by my mouth.5For John indeed baptized with water: but you shall be baptized with the Holy Ghost, not many days hence.6They therefore who were come together, asked him, saying: Lord, wilt thou at this time restore again the kingdom of Israel?7But he said to them: It is not for you to know the time or moments, which the Father hath put in his own power:8But you shall receive the power of the Holy Ghost coming upon you, and you shall be witnesses unto me in Jerusalem, and in all Judea, and Samaria, and even to the uttermost part of the earth.9And when he had said these things, while they looked on, he was raised up: and a cloud received him out of their sight.10And while they were beholding him going up to heaven, behold two men stood by them in white garments.11Who also said: Ye men of Galilee, why stand you looking up to heaven? This Jesus who is taken up from you into heaven, shall so come as you have seen him going into heaven.

commentary

And eating together with them (v. 4) is where the manuscripts part company. Witham notes that the Douay is here a literal rendering of the Vulgate, whose Greek is sunalizomenos, glossed in the note a salis & mensæ communione — from the sharing of salt and the table; but some copies read sunaulizomenos, and the Protestant version accordingly has "being assembled together." Nothing doctrinal hangs on it, and yet a good deal does: whether the forty days' evidence was a shared room or a shared meal. Witham reports that Mr. Bois defends the Latin on the authority of Chrysostom, "who doubtless understood the Greek text as well as any one" and takes the word for eating — the apostles elsewhere prove the resurrection precisely by his having eaten and drunk with them. Jerome derives the word from eating salt together. Salt, not sight, is the argument.

That preference for tangible evidence runs through the whole passage. Chrysostom faces the awkward question of why the risen Christ appeared only to the disciples, and answers that to those who did not know the mystery he would have seemed a phantom: if his own men were "diffident, and terrified, and required to touch him with their hands," others would have fared worse. He then turns the objection inside out. Suppose the apostles worked no miracles at all — the world was still converted, and that twelve poor illiterate fishermen should have done it without miracles "would be the greatest of all miracles." (v. 2) shows the same care about what is actually being claimed. Because the text was written without stops or commas, Witham observes, it is genuinely unclear what by the Holy Ghost governs: that Christ was taken up by the Spirit, which he says is generally rejected; that his commands were spiritual ones, from the Spirit, which is Chrysostom's; or, as Witham thinks most probable, that he chose and commissioned his apostles by the Spirit. Bristow spells out what that commission contained — power to preach, to baptize, to remit sins, "and generally the whole commission and charge of the government of his Church." Estius, reading speaking of the kingdom of God (v. 3) as the Greek has it, of the things pertaining to that kingdom, finds in the phrase an argument for what Christ taught in those weeks and never wrote down.

The angels' rebuke in (v. 11) is aimed at a posture, not at grief: why stand you looking up to heaven? Chrysostom seizes on the word going — it intimates that Christ ascended by his own power, as Witham has already noted at (v. 9) that he "raised himself up," and so will come by his own power to judge. Which means the upward stare misplaces him twice over, both in where he now is and in what he has left behind. Chrysostom's exclamation is the answer: "He that sitteth with his Father above, is at the same time handled by men below... Elias being taken up, left his disciple, Eliseus, his mantle and double spirit, but the Son of Man ascending, left his own flesh for us." The modern version of the Galilean stare is the assumption that a religion of a departed founder can only be memory and imitation — a mantle at best. Calmet records that Sulpicius Severus and Paulinus attest the marks of the Lord's feet on the place from which he rose, that many in Augustine's day travelled to Judea to venerate them, and that Helen built a church there. The prints face upward. The direction they were made in was outward, to the uttermost part of the earth.

· sources ·

The complete public-domain commentary this reading's note draws from, unabridged. Every claim in the note traces to a passage here.

First Reading Acts 1:1-11

Haydock Catholic Bible Commentary · Public Domain
1:1

St. Luke, who was the author of this history, alludes, in this verse, to his gospel, which he calls his first discourse. In that he informs us, not only of the actions, but also the doctrines of our Saviour. These words, to do and to teach, are the abridgment of the whole gospel: here he gives us the Acts of the Apostles, that is, an history of their travels and preaching. In the beginning of this work he speaks of all the apostles, and what they did before their dispersion. As soon as he comes to the mention of St. Paul, he takes notice of no one else, but is entirely taken up with the narrative of his actions. He addresses his book to Theophilus, which signifies a friend of God, or one who loves God, as if he intended to dedicate it to all the faithful, who believed in, and loved God. But it is more probable that this was the same distinct person, well known to St. Luke, and illustrious for his birth, because he gave him the title of Greek: kratiste, most excellent. [Luke i. 3.] (Calmet)

1:2

Until the day on which, giving commandments by the Holy Ghost to the apostles whom he had chosen, he was taken up. As the Scripture was written without distinction of verses, and without any stops, or commas, which were added afterwards) the construction, and joining of words in this verse, is ambiguous. The question is, with what part of the verse these words, by the Holy Ghost, are to be joined. The sense may be, 1. that he was taken up by the Holy Ghost: but this is generally rejected. 2. That he gave his commandments by the Holy Ghost to his apostles; that is, says St. John Chrysostom, that he gave them spiritual commands, that came from the Holy Ghost, or from his holy Spirit. 3. The most probable exposition seems to be, that he gave his special commandments to his apostles, or to those whom he chose to be his apostles, by the Holy Ghost, or by his holy and divine spirit. (Witham) --- The power to preach, to baptize, to remit sins, and generally the whole commission and charge of the government of his Church after him in his name, and with his authority; which government was given them, together with the Holy Ghost, to assist them therein for ever. (Bristow)

1:3

Appearing, &c. Why did he not appear to all, but only to his disciples? Because to many of them, who did not know the mystery, he would have seemed a phantom. For if the disciples themselves were diffident, and terrified, and required to touch him with their hands, how would others have been affected? But we know from their miracles, the truth of the resurrection, which is made evident to all succeeding generations. Perhaps the apostles did not perform miracles. How then was the world converted? This is a fact which cannot be denied, and that it should have been brought about by twelve poor illiterate fishermen, without miracles, would be the greatest of all miracles, far beyond the reach of all human means. (St. John Chrysostom, hom. i. chap. 1. on Acts.) --- "And speaking of things pertaining to the kingdom of God," as we read in the Greek, and in the Protestant version, that is, pertaining to the Church, which is the kingdom of God, Greek: ta peri tes basileias tou theou, which plainly makes for unwritten tradition. (Estius)

1:4 · bibliography — editions & variants cited above

And eating with them.[1] This is a literal translation from the vulgar Latin. But the Protestant translation from some Greek copies, would have it, And being assembled together, he commanded them, &c. Mr. Bois defends the Latin Vulgate and even by the authority of St. John Chrysostom who doubtless understood the Greek text, as well as any one, and who takes the Greek word here to signify eating: for he observes that he apostles elsewhere proved Christ's resurrection by his eating and drinking with them. (Acts x. 4.) St. Jerome also says, the derivation of the Greek word, is from eating salt together. (Witham)

Greek: sunalizomenos, A salis & mensæ communione. Some copies Greek: sunaulizomenos.

1:5

Baptized with the Holy Ghost, that is, cleansed, and sanctified by the plentiful graces he shall pour upon you. (Witham)

1:6–7

Wilt thou at this time restore again the kingdom of Israel? Some of them, as St. John Chrysostom observes, had still their thoughts upon a temporal kingdom of the Messias. Christ, to divert them from such imaginations, tells them, their business is to be witnesses of his doctrine and miracles, particularly of his resurrection, even to the utmost bounds of the earth, to all the nations of the world. (Witham)

1:9

He was raised up. Raised himself up, and ascended, &c. (Witham)

1:10

Behold two men, that is, two angels, stood by them in white apparel. (Witham)

1:11

So shall he come, as you have seen him going. This word going, says St. John Chrysostom, sufficiently intimates, that he ascended by his own power: for so will he come by his own power to judge the world. (Witham) --- Jesus Christ shall come on the last day, in the same body, in the same majesty, to judge the living and the dead. This he had likewise promised, in more than one place of the gospel, speaking of the vengeance, which he will exercise on the city of Jerusalem. St. Jerome, St. Hilary, and many other ancients, have believed that the Son of God will appear again on Mount Olivet, and that all people shall be assembled to judgment. (St. Jerome, super Joel iii. 2.; St. Hilary, super Matthew xxiv. 32.) --- And that same body, which thus ascended to heaven, and which will thus descend, is given us in the blessed Sacrament. "O miracle! exclaims St. John Chrysostom, He that sitteth with his Father above, is at the same time handled by men below. Jesus Christ ascending to heaven, both hath his flesh with him above, and hath left it with us below. Elias being taken up, left his disciple, Eliseus, his mantle and double spirit, but the Son of Man ascending, left his own flesh for us." (Lib. iii. de Sacerd. him. 2. ad pop. Ant. hom. de divit. et paup.) --- Sulpicius Severus, and St. Paulinus, assure us, that the marks of the feet of our Saviour were imprinted in the place off which he rose to heaven; and St. Augustine informs us, that many in his time went to Judea, to venerate these sacred marks. Ven. Bede testifies the same in the eighth age [i.e. in the 8th century]. In the time of Constantine the great, the empress Helen built a church on the place. (Calmet)