✠ daily readings

jump to a date

readings are available from 2025-01-01 through 2026-12-31.

search

search by feast, season, or scripture reference.

type to search…

←
Sun · May 10, 2026 · Eastertide

6th Sunday of Easter

→
USCCB ↗

First Reading · Acts 8:5-8, 14-17

5And Philip, going down to the city of Samaria, preached Christ unto them.6And the people with one accord were attentive to those things which were said by Philip, hearing, and seeing the miracles which he did.7For many of them who had unclean spirits, crying with a loud voice, went out.8And many, taken with the palsy, and that were lame, were healed.14Now, when the apostles, who were in Jerusalem, had heard that Samaria had received the word of God, they sent unto them Peter and John.15Who, when they were come, prayed for them that they might receive the Holy Ghost.16For he was not as yet come upon any of them: but they were only baptized in the name of the Lord Jesus.17Then they laid their hands upon them: and they received the Holy Ghost.

commentary

The awkward verse is v. 16: the Holy Ghost was not as yet come upon any of them: but they were only baptized in the name of the Lord Jesus. Baptized, and yet something has not happened. Haydock's commentary on this reading is concentrated almost entirely on vv. 15-17 — on Philip's Samaritan converts he offers little, and the note follows the sources rather than filling the gap — but on this point it is dense. His first move is to refuse the flat reading of v. 16. The Samaritans had received the Holy Ghost at baptism in one sense already: the spirit "of grace, of justice, and of sanctity." What Peter and John came down to give was something else, "the spirit of strength, to confess with confidence and freedom the name of Jesus," together with the miraculous gifts then commonly granted by the imposition of hands. The verse is not describing baptized people who were somehow still outside grace; it is describing a second thing that baptism does not do.

The reason for the journey from Jerusalem is therefore not that Philip's work was defective but that it was bounded. Haydock states it without softening: Philip did not administer the sacrament because he could not; he was not a bishop. He anchors this on Chrysostom's eighteenth homily on Acts, which the source quotes in transliteration as oude gar eichen exousian — Witham renders the point plainly, that Philip the deacon "had not the power to give" it — and then draws the ecclesial conclusion in a Latin tag: præcipuos et non alios videmus hoc facere, we see the chief pastors and no others doing this. Two further witnesses are brought in for what the bare text omits. Haydock concedes that unction is not mentioned here, and answers not by finding it in the verse but by appeal to antiquity: Cyprian, in the third century, requires that the baptized also be anointed, so that having received the chrism he may be "the anointed of God." Pacianus argues in the fourth by reductio against an opponent who confines these powers to the apostles alone — if that is so, he replies, then the apostles alone could baptize, since the command was given to them alone; and if the right to baptize and anoint did descend to their successors, then so did the power of binding and loosing. The argument stands or falls on whether apostolic acts are personal privileges or transmissible offices, and Pacianus makes his opponent choose.

What this rules out is the assumption that being validly begun is the same as being equipped. The Samaritans lacked nothing needed for holiness and still lacked what the apostles travelled to bring — and what they lacked was specifically the nerve to say the name in public. That is a live distinction wherever a settled interior faith is treated as the whole of the thing, and public confession as an optional temperament for people who happen to be bold. Haydock's phrase repays attention: not the spirit of insight, or of feeling, but of strength, and strength for one particular act. The chapter's opening verses are already full of noise — unclean spirits crying with a loud voice, the palsied and the lame walking — and none of that came from the Samaritans themselves. Neither did the courage. Both arrived from outside, by someone else's hands.

· sources ·

The complete public-domain commentary this reading's note draws from, unabridged. Every claim in the note traces to a passage here.

First Reading Acts 8:5-8, 14-17

Haydock Catholic Bible Commentary · Public Domain
8:15

The Holy Ghost, which the apostles came to give the Samaritan Neophytes, was not the spirit of grace, of justice, and of sanctity, for that they had received at baptism; but the spirit of strength, to confess with confidence and freedom the name of Jesus, and the supernatural and miraculous graces, usually at that time granted to the faithful, by the imposition of hands. Philip did not administer the sacrament, because he could not; he was not a bishop. Hence now in the Church, we see only the chief pastors do it, præcipuos et non alios videmus hoc facere. See St. John Chrysostom, hom. xviii. in Acta. --- There is no mention here, it is true, of unction, but the most venerable antiquity clearly specifies it. St. Cyprian, in the third age [third century], says: "it is moreover necessary, that he who has been baptized, should be anointed, that having received the chrism, that is, the unction, he may be the anointed of God." (Ep. lxx.) --- In the next age [fourth century], St. Pacianus writes: "Do you say that this (the power of remitting sins) was granted only to the apostles? Then I say, that they alone could baptize, and give the Holy Spirit, for to them alone was the command of doing it given. If, therefore, the right of conferring baptism, and of anointing, descended to their successors, to them also has come the power of binding and loosing." (Ep. i. ad Sym. Bibl. Max. T. iv. p. 307)

8:17 · bibliography — editions & variants cited above

They received the Holy Ghost. Not but that they had received the grace of the Holy Ghost at their baptism; but not that plentitude of grace, and those gifts, which they received from bishops in the sacrament of confirmation. This sacrament, as St. John Chrysostom observes,[2] St. Philip, the deacon, had not the power to give. (Witham)

St. John Chrysostom, hom. xviii. Greek: oude gar eichen exousian.