✠ daily readings

jump to a date

readings are available from 2025-01-01 through 2026-12-31.

search

search by feast, season, or scripture reference.

type to search…

←
Thu · May 7, 2026 · Eastertide

Thursday of the 5th week of Easter

→
USCCB ↗

First Reading · Acts 15:7-21

7And when there had been much disputing, Peter, rising up, said to them: Men, brethren, you know that in former days God made choice among us, that by my mouth the Gentiles should hear the word of the gospel and believe.8And God, who knoweth the hearts, gave testimony, giving unto them the Holy Ghost, as well as to us:9And put no difference between us and them, purifying their hearts by faith.10Now therefore, why tempt you God to put a yoke upon the necks of the disciples which neither our fathers nor we have been able to bear?11But by the grace of the Lord Jesus Christ, we believe to be saved, in like manner as they also.12And all the multitude held their peace: and they heard Barnabas and Paul telling what great signs and wonders God had wrought among the Gentiles by them.13And after they had held their peace, James answered, saying: Men, brethren, hear me.14Simon hath related how God first visited to take to the Gentiles, a people to his name.15And to this agree the words of the prophets, as it is written:16After these things I will return and will rebuild the tabernacle of David, which is fallen down: and the ruins thereof I will rebuild. And I will set it up:17That the residue of men may seek after the Lord, and all nations upon whom my name is invoked, saith the Lord, who doth these things.18To the Lord was his own work known from the beginning of the world.19For which cause, judge that they who from among the Gentiles are converted to God are not to be disquieted:20But that we write unto them, that they refrain themselves from the pollutions of idols and from fornication and from things strangled and from blood.21For Moses of old time hath in every city them that preach him in the synagogues, where he is read every sabbath.

commentary

Peter appeals to "former days" — literally, Witham notes, in the days of old. He means the conversion of Cornelius, which Witham dates to about the year 35, against a council sitting in 51. Sixteen years is the whole antiquity this Church has, and it is enough to argue from. The prophecy James produces has a longer memory and a stranger textual history. Calmet observes that the passage is quoted from the Septuagint, and that the Hebrew reads differently: I will raise up the house of David... that it may possess all the nations. On that reading the promise is territorial, and Calmet says plainly that it was never kept — the nations never were subject to the house of David, nor known by the name of the people of God. Taken historically, of the prosperity of Juda under Ezechias or of the return from captivity, "it is certain that the prophecy never had its entire accomplishment." The Greek James actually quotes says something else: that the residue of men may seek after the Lord (v. 17). Possession has become search, and the verse James builds a ruling on is one that only the version in front of him supports.

The council's shape is read as closely as its texts. Jerome notes the order — Peter, at the head of the council, spoke first; James, as bishop of Jerusalem, spoke next; and all came into the sentence of Peter. Chrysostom concedes that James carried a special authority in that room, both as local bishop and because those most zealous for the law held him in veneration, "but his power was certainly inferior to that of St. Peter, who was head of all." What the council then does with that authority is the passage's most contested move. Menochius reads the abstentions imposed in v. 20 as an indulgence granted to Jewish feeling so that the bond between the two communities might hold — a concession matched by the far larger one the Jewish believers were making in giving up the ceremonial law, and therefore "only temporary, and to cease with the reasons which gave rise to it." Bristow takes the same verse as a demonstration of something permanent: that the Church and her councils may make decrees, lasting or temporary, "without any express Scripture at all," and that by such an exaction things previously indifferent become of strict obligation. Even the closing verse is disputed. Calmet hears in v. 21 a reassurance to the Jews that Moses is not abandoned — the law "shall subsist for ever in a more perfect state, read in the synagogue, and revered by the Church" — while Tirinus reports others who read the same sentence as a parting of ways: let the Jews hear Moses in their assemblies; we have other laws.

Two errors are rebuked at once, and they are usually held by opposite parties. One is the demand that every binding rule be produced verbatim from Scripture, which Bristow answers by pointing at a decree that was binding and was not; the other is the instinct to freeze a pastoral accommodation into a perpetual precept, which Menochius forecloses by naming the reasons that would one day lapse. Between them stands Witham's definition of what Peter calls tempting God: calling in question what he has already sufficiently attested and approved. The council's decisive evidence was not an argument. It was a report — and the room's response to it is the detail Luke keeps: after much disputing, the whole multitude fell silent and listened while Barnabas and Paul told what God had done among the Gentiles.

· sources ·

The complete public-domain commentary this reading's note draws from, unabridged. Every claim in the note traces to a passage here.

First Reading Acts 15:7-21

Haydock Catholic Bible Commentary · Public Domain
15:7

Former days. Literally, in the days of old; that is, at the conversion of Cornelius, many years ago, about the year 35; and it was now 51. (Witham) --- St. Peter at the head of the Council, spoke first; St. James as Bishop of Jerusalem, spoke next, and all, as St. Jerome says, came into the sentence of Peter. (Ep. lxxxix. ad. S. Aug. chap. 2.)

15:10

Why tempt you God, by calling in question what he hath sufficiently attested, and approved, and by being incredulous to his promises of giving salvation to the Gentiles, and to all nations. (Witham)

15:11

In the historical sense he is speaking of the prosperity of the house of Juda, in the reign of Ezechias, or their return from captivity. But in this respect, it is certain that the prophecy never had its entire accomplishment. The passage in the text is cited from the Septuagint. The Hebrew is, "I will raise up the house of David...that it may possess all the nations," &c. Now it is true that the nations never were subject to the house of David, or known by the name of the people of God; but by their vocation to the gospel, as St. James explains it. (Calmet)

15:18

To the Lord was known his own work. He bringeth it to pass, as he hath decreed, though his decrees are to us unknown. (Witham)

15:19

Wherefore I judge, and join my judgment with Peter. St. John Chrysostom thinks that James had a special authority in the Council, as bishop of Jerusalem, and because of the great veneration, which those zealous for the Jewish law had for him: but his power was certainly inferior to that of St. Peter, who was head of all, as St. John Chrysostom teacheth, hom. iii. on the Acts.

15:20

Things strangled and from blood. In these prohibitions, the Church indulged the particular feelings of the Jews, that the bond of union between them and the Gentiles might be more closely united; the latter in these two instances giving way to the prejudices of the former, who in their turn gave up much, by submitting to the abolition of the ceremonial law of Moses. This prohibition was of course only temporary, and to cease with the reasons, which gave rise to it. (Menochius) --- The Jews had such a horror of blood, that they considered those who eat it as defiled, and violators of the law of nature. The Lord had in effect from the beginning forbidden the use of blood to Noe [Noah], (Genesis ix. 4.) which he likewise reported in the strongest terms in Leviticus viii. 26. By this we see the great authority of God's Church, and Councils which may make permanent or temporary decrees, such as are fitting for the state of the times or peoples, without any express Scripture at all, and by this authoritative exaction, things become of strict obligation, which previous to it, were in themselves indifferent. (Bristow)

15:21

For Moses...hath in every city. Not only the Jews, but the Christians converted from Judaism, still followed the ceremonies of the law of Moses. (Witham) --- Let not the Jews complain, that we abandon Moses, and destroy the law by this regulation. No: it shall subsist for ever in a more perfect state, read in the synagogue, and revered by the Church. (Calmet) --- Others give a different explanation of this verse. Let the Jews, say they, follow Moses, and hear him in their assemblies; we have other laws, and enjoy other privileges. (Tirinus)