✠ daily readings

jump to a date

readings are available from 2025-01-01 through 2026-12-31.

search

search by feast, season, or scripture reference.

type to search…

←
Tue · May 5, 2026 · Eastertide

Tuesday of the 5th week of Easter

→
USCCB ↗

First Reading · Acts 14:19-28

19But as the disciples stood round about him, he rose up and entered into the city: and the next day he departed with Barnabas to Derbe.20And when they had preached the gospel to that city and had taught many, they returned again to Lystra and to Iconium and to Antioch:21Confirming the souls of the disciples and exhorting them to continue in the faith: and that through many tribulations we must enter into the kingdom of God.22And when they had ordained to them priests in every church and had prayed with fasting, they commended them to the Lord, in whom they believed.23And passing through Pisidia, they came into Pamphylia.24And having spoken the word of the Lord in Perge, they went down into Attalia.25And thence they sailed to Antioch, from whence they had been delivered to the grace of God, unto the work which they accomplished.26And when they were come and had assembled the church, they related what great things God had done with them and how he had opened the door of faith to the Gentiles.27And they abode no small time with the disciples.

commentary

One verb in v. 22 has carried more controversy than the whole missionary circuit around it. Haydock prints the Latin cum constituissent presbyteros beside the Greek, which he transliterates cheirotonesantes presbuterous, and the fight is over both words. Witham notes that Protestant versions follow the grammatical etymology of presbyter and always render "elders" — though, he adds, divines of the Church of England themselves allow that the word here means the ministers known as bishops or priests, and in any case elders by age and years is plainly not what is meant, since the English priest and the French prêtre both descend from presbyter anyway. The sharper claim concerns the verb: because it can suggest a show of hands, Calvinist translators rendered it "ordained by election," making the ministers of these new churches the choice of the congregation rather than the act of a bishop. Witham calls the argument frivolous and hands it to Bois, whose rule is the useful part — look at usum loquendi rather than at the syllables themselves, "to which it is often not very safe to cling," and the verb declares nothing beyond constituere, creare, ordinare.

Bristow draws three conclusions and does not soften them: that Paul and Barnabas were bishops, having authority to confer holy orders; that a difference between bishops and priests already existed even though the primitive Church used the names indifferently; and that fasting and prayer were the constant preparation for holy orders — which is why Luke reports them here as part of the act, not as pious framing around it. The narrative makes the same point structurally. Witham observes that Antioch, where the circuit ends, is exactly where it began: the place they had been "delivered to the grace of God," where the Spirit's direction first chose them and where they were themselves ordained and given power to discharge their office. What they hand on at Lystra and Iconium is what was handed to them at Antioch, and the report they bring home in v. 26 — that God had opened the door of faith to the Gentiles — describes a door with hinges. Against this, Denis the Carthusian reads v. 21 as the cost of the same arrangement: daily offences require the Almighty's paternal chastisement, and the concupiscence that wills against the spirit has to be subdued by punishment. His conclusion is blunt. "Woe then to you, lovers of this world, who wish to pass your lives without tribulation, enemies of the cross... Did it not become Christ first to suffer, and thus to enter into his glory? and shall we pretend to enter by any other means?"

Both halves cut against instincts that are still live. The first is the assumption that a church is a voluntary society which appoints its officers by agreement, so that ministry is delegated upward from those served rather than received from those sent — the precise reading Bois's rule about not clinging to syllables was written to block. The second is the settled modern expectation that a well-ordered spiritual life should feel like one, which Denis names not as immaturity but as enmity to the cross. What the passage requires instead is visible in the sentence Luke reports without any comment at all: the disciples are standing in a ring around Paul, and he rises up and walks back into the city (v. 19), and the next day sets out for Derbe.

· sources ·

The complete public-domain commentary this reading's note draws from, unabridged. Every claim in the note traces to a passage here.

First Reading Acts 14:19-28

Haydock Catholic Bible Commentary · Public Domain
14:21

Through many tribulations. Our daily offences required the paternal chastisement of the Almighty. The concupiscence of the flesh too, which wills against the spirit, must be subdued by punishment. Woe then to you, lovers of this world, who wish to pass your lives without tribulation, enemies of the cross. Senseless creatures, is the disciple above his master? Did it not become Christ first to suffer, and thus to enter into his glory? and shall we pretend to enter by any other means? &c. (Denis the Carthusian)

14:22 · bibliography — editions & variants cited above

When they had ordained for them priests.[1] The Protestant translation, following the grammatical etymology of the Greek word presbyter, always puts elders. Yet they of the Church of England allow, and maintain, that by this Greek word in this, and many other places, are signified the ministers of God, known by the name of bishops or priests, according to the ecclesiastical use of the same word. It is evident that here are not meant elders, as to age and years. Nay, though we adhere to the grammatical signification, we should rather translate priests, since the English word priest, as well as the French word pretre, come from presbyter. But of this word more hereafter. We may also take notice, that the Calvinists here translate, ordained by election, pretending by the derivation of the Greek word, that church ministers were only chosen, and deputed by the votes and suffrages of people; and not by any ordination, or consecration by a bishop; nor by any character or sacrament of order. But their argument from this Greek word is frivolous, and groundless, as hath been shewn by Mr. Bois on this verse, by Mr. Legh in his Critica Sacra, &c. (Witham) --- We see from this text, 1st, that Sts. Paul and Barnabas were bishops, having authority to confer holy orders: 2nd. that there was even then a difference betwixt bishops and priests, though the name in the primitive Church was often used indifferently; 3rd. that fasting and praying were constant preparatives for holy orders. (Bristow)

Cum constituissent presbyteros, Greek: cheirotonesantes presbuterous. Mr. Bois on this verse: Si usum loquendi potius quam syllabas ipsas, quibus inhærere sæpe parum tutum est, respicias, Greek: cheirotonein, nihil aliud declarat, quam constituere, creare, ordinare. See Mr. Legh, in thesauro linguæ græcæ.

14:24

This Antioch was a sea-port in Pamphylia. (Bible de Vence)

14:25

From whence they had been delivered, up to their ministry, and their apostolical mission by the grace of God; that is, where they had been first chosen by the direction of the Spirit of God, ordained priests and bishops, and had received power, and graces to discharge their offices of apostles. (Witham)

14:27

No little time. It is not precisely known how long he remained there, nor what he did. St. Luke relates nothing of what happened from the 46th year of Christ to the 51st [from A.D. 46 to A.D. 51], in which the Council of Jerusalem was held. It is probable St. Paul spent that time carrying the gospel among the neighbouring provinces. (Calmet)