✠ daily readings

jump to a date

readings are available from 2025-01-01 through 2026-12-31.

search

search by feast, season, or scripture reference.

type to search…

←
Sat · May 2, 2026 · Eastertide

Saint Athanasius, Bishop and Doctor

→
USCCB ↗

First Reading · Acts 13:44-52

44But the next sabbath day, the whole city almost came together, to hear the word of God.45And the Jews, seeing the multitudes, were filled with envy and contradicted those things which were said by Paul, blaspheming.46Then Paul and Barnabas said boldly: To you it behoved us first to speak the word of God: but because you reject it and judge yourselves unworthy of eternal life, behold we turn to the Gentiles.47For so the Lord hath commanded us: I have set thee to be the light of the Gentiles: that thou mayest be for salvation unto the utmost part of the earth.48And the Gentiles hearing it were glad and glorified the word of the Lord: and as many as were ordained to life everlasting believed.49And the word of the Lord was published throughout the whole country.50But the Jews stirred up religious and honourable women and the chief men of the city: and raised persecution against Paul and Barnabas: and cast them out of their coasts.51But they, shaking off the dust of their feet against them, came to Iconium.52And the disciples were filled with joy and with the Holy Ghost.

commentary

Two verses apart, the same phrase is used twice with the agency reversed. In v. 46 the synagogue at Antioch "judge yourselves unworthy of eternal life"; in v. 48 the Gentiles who believe are those "ordained to life everlasting." Haydock's marginal apparatus fixes on the second, recording the Vulgate's præordinati and, behind it, the Greek tetagmenoi, which Chrysostom glosses aphorismenoi — set apart, prædefiniti, predefined. Everything turns on how strong that participle is allowed to be, and Haydock reports the softer option honestly before rejecting it: "some understand this as if it meant, predisposed by their docility, to receive the word of life." Read that way the verse describes a temperament. Read the other way it describes a decree. Haydock's own rendering leaves no doubt where he stands — "as many as were pre-ordained to eternal life" — and Witham fills in the cause: "by the free election, and special mercies, and providence of God." The Fathers, Haydock says, "unanimously understand it literally of predestination."

Having taken the hard reading, Haydock spends the rest of the note fencing it. He takes Aquinas's definition — predestination is "the disposition of God, by which he prepares, what he will himself perform, according to his infallible foreknowledge" — and restates it in plainer terms as "the manner in which God conducts a reasonable creature to its proper destiny." Three things are then held simultaneously. The decree is infallible and must have its effect; it is nevertheless "far removed from the blasphemy of Calvinists, who pretend that it destroys free-will, and therefore removes all motives of exertion to good works"; and the divine foreknowledge "no ways interferes with man's liberty, but leaves him still a perfectly free agent, and therefore responsible for his actions." To these Haydock adds a fourth, from the Council of Trent: no one can certainly know that he is of the number of the predestined, absent a special revelation. The result is deliberately unfinished. Rather than derive consequences from the three positions, Haydock stops, on Augustine's authority — melius est dubitare de occultis, quam litigare de occultis, better to confess our ignorance on mysteries than idly to dispute on mysteries.

Haydock's impatience is aimed at his own contemporaries, not at readers in general: "would that this sober line of conduct were pursued by many moderns, who at present talk and write so much on this subject, and to such little purpose." The sentence has not aged out of usefulness. Both errors it brackets are still in circulation — the deduction that an infallible decree makes exertion pointless, which Haydock calls blasphemy rather than logic, and the opposite confidence that one has read one's own name in the decree, which Trent simply forbids. What the passage requires instead is the posture of the men who leave Antioch: shaking the dust from their feet, walking on to Iconium without any assurance about the outcome, while behind them the disciples they left were "filled with joy and with the Holy Ghost" (v. 52). Not one of them had been told he was of the number. They went anyway.

· sources ·

The complete public-domain commentary this reading's note draws from, unabridged. Every claim in the note traces to a passage here.

First Reading Acts 13:44-52

Haydock Catholic Bible Commentary · Public Domain
13:44

The whole city. Not only Jews, but a great many Gentiles, which exasperated the envious Jews. (Witham)

13:48 · bibliography — editions & variants cited above

As many as were pre-ordained to eternal life,[3] by the free election, and special mercies, and providence of God. (Witham) --- Some understand this as if it meant, predisposed by their docility, to receive the word of life. But the Fathers unanimously understand it literally of predestination, which is defined by St. Thomas Aquinas, serm. i. qu. 23. a. 1. "The disposition of God, by which he prepares, what he will himself perform, according to his infallible foreknowledge." In other words, it is the manner in which God conducts a reasonable creature to its proper destiny, which is eternal life. In this mystery of the Catholic faith, which cannot be clearly explained to human understanding, because it is a mystery, there are nevertheless several points, which we know for certain. 1st. Though it is certain, that this decree of the Almighty is infallible, and must have its effect, yet it is far removed from the blasphemy of Calvinists, who pretend that it destroys free-will, and therefore removes all motives of exertion to good works. 2nd. For it is a point of Catholic faith, that this foreknowledge of the Almighty no ways interferes with man's liberty, but leaves him still a perfectly free agent, and therefore responsible for his actions. 3rd. It is likewise decreed by the Council of Trent, that no one can certainly know that he is of the number of the predestined, without a special revelation to that effect. These are the most essential points, which it concerns us to know of this doctrine. As to the consequences which may be drawn from these positions, it were better for us to submit our understandings to the obedience of faith, than entangle ourselves in a maze of abstruse errors, far removed from our comprehension. Would that this sober line of conduct were pursued by many moderns, who at present talk and write so much on this subject, and to such little purpose. How excellently well does the great genius of the Latin Church, St. Augustine, say: Melius est dubitare de occultis, quam litigare de occultis! How much wiser and better is it to confess our ignorance on mysteries, than idly to dispute on mysteries! (lib. viii. de Gen. ad litt. chap. 5.)

Præordinati, Greek: tetagmenoi, on which St. John Chrysostom says, Greek: toutesti aphorismenoi, prædefiniti.

13:51

Shaking off the dust, &c. See the Annotations, Matthew x. 14.