✠ daily readings

jump to a date

readings are available from 2025-01-01 through 2027-12-31.

search

search by feast, season, or scripture reference.

type to search…

←
Lectionary 667 · Solemnities and Feasts of the Lord

All Saints

→
USCCB ↗

First Reading · Revelation 7:2-4, 9-14

2And I saw another angel ascending from the rising of the sun, having the sign of the living God. And he cried with a loud voice to the four angels to whom it was given to hurt the earth and the sea,3Saying: Hurt not the earth nor the sea nor the trees, till we sign the servants of our God in their foreheads.4And I heard the number of them that were signed. An hundred forty-four thousand were signed, of every tribe of the children of Israel.9After this, I saw a great multitude, which no man could number, of all nations and tribes and peoples and tongues, standing before the throne and in sight of the Lamb, clothed with white robes, and palms in their hands.10And they cried with a loud voice, saying: Salvation to our God, who sitteth upon the throne and to the Lamb.11And all the angels stood round about the throne and the ancients and the four living creatures. And they fell down before the throne upon their faces and adored God,12Saying: Amen. Benediction and glory and wisdom and thanksgiving, honour and power and strength, to our God, for ever and ever. Amen.13And one of the ancients answered and said to me: These that are clothed in white robes, who are they? And whence came they?14And I said to him: My Lord, thou knowest. And he said to me: These are they who are come out of great tribulation and have washed their robes and have made them white in the blood of the Lamb.

commentary

The angel who comes up from the rising of the sun carries no weapon, only a mark, and the whole vision turns on where he puts it: till we sign the servants of our God in their foreheads (v. 3). Haydock's note sends the reader back to Ezechiel 9:4, where God tells an angel to mark with the letter Tau the foreheads of those the coming judgment must pass over — a letter whose shape, Witham says, was a figure and resemblance of the cross. Calmet supplies the ordinary background that makes the gesture legible: in the East it was the custom to burn an indelible mark into soldiers, so that a sealed man is a claimed man, and known by sight. Then the arithmetic, which is stranger than it looks. A hundred forty-four thousand are sealed out of Israel (v. 4), and immediately afterwards John sees a multitude which no man could number (v. 9). The two are not rivals.

Bede refuses to read the figure literally, and his reason is textual rather than pious: the roll omits the tribe of Dan, which certainly produced some of the elect, and puts Joseph in place of Ephraim — so a strict count would hand Joseph a double portion and Dan none at all. The number means a great many, no more. Witham draws the complementary point, that the sealed thousands stand for the Jews converted and saved while the far greater harvest is gathered from the Gentiles of all nations. On what the seal actually does, Witham is careful: it is not a talisman but a strengthening, and he reads hurt not the earth as meaning that trials are held back until the servants of God are fortified by the Spirit — the same sealing St. Paul speaks of in 2 Corinthians i. 22 and Ephesians i. 13. Sealing and tribulation are therefore sequential, not alternatives. The ancient answers the question he asked himself: these came out of great tribulation, and their robes are white because they were washed in blood (v. 14). Calmet insists the whole verse be taken mystically — the washing happens when a man enters the Church by baptism, or scours his sins away by penance or by martyrdom.

Witham spends his longest note on Andrew Willet, who had argued in his Synopsis Papismi that the sign of the cross is one of the visible marks of antichrist, deriving it from the letters behind the number of the beast. Witham's reply is not theological but historical: Tertullian already records Christians tracing the cross on their foreheads at every setting out and coming home, at dressing, at the bath, at table, at lighting a candle, at going to bed, and calls it a tradition handed from father to son; and the Book of Common Prayer Willet lived under required the priest to sign the forehead of every baptized child. The embarrassment Witham is answering has not gone away; it has only changed register, from theological suspicion to a modern preference for faith that leaves no visible trace, that can be carried into an office or a family gathering without anyone having to notice. This passage will not allow it. The seal that saves is worn on the face, where it can be read.

· sources ·

The complete public-domain commentary this reading's note draws from, unabridged. Every claim in the note traces to a passage here.

First Reading Revelation 7:2-4, 9-14

Haydock Catholic Bible Commentary · Public Domain
7:2

Having the seal. This sign is generally supposed to be the sign of the cross. In the East, it was the custom to impress some indelible mark upon the soldiers. This sign [the sign of the cross] amongst the ancient Christians was used on every occasion. (Calmet)

7:3

Hurt not the earth, &c. Some understand Christ himself, who gives his commands in this manner to the Angels; others, an Angel of a higher rank or order. --- Till we seal the servants of our God in their foreheads, which may be expounded, let not persecutions and trials come upon them till they are strengthened by the spirit and grace of God, with which St. Paul sometimes says the servants of God are signed and sealed. See 2 Corinthians i. 22.; Ephesians i. 13. He alludes to the passages of Ezechiel (Chap. ix. 4.) where God bids and angel mark with the letter Tau the foreheads of those who should not be hurt by the judgments that were to fall upon Jerusalem; so God would protect the faithful Christians, who believe and put their trust in Christ crucified, and who from the first ages [centuries], in testimony of this faith, used to sign themselves by making the sign of the cross on their foreheads, of which the letter Tau was a figure or resemblance. See Tertullian, de lib. Corona militis. I beg the readers patience, if I here set down what I find in the great Synopsis Papismi, in folio, put out by Mr. Andrew Willet, and dedicated first to queen Elizabeth, and afterwards to king James the first. Among his demonstrations, as he calls them, that the pope is the antichrist, (Controv. iv. q. 10. p. 232 and 233) he tells us in plain terms, "that the sign of the cross is one of the visible signs of antichrist. And who," saith he, "hath taught the papists that the sign of the cross is to be borne or made on men's foreheads? And that with crossing the forehead we are preserved from dangers? The superstitious marks of the cross had their beginning from the beast's name, since the number of the beast's name in the Revelation of St. John is by these Greek letters, Greek: chxs. The first letter, Greek: ch, is a cross; the middle letter, Greek: x, (in Latin, X) is also a side long cross; and the last letter, Greek: s, contains both Greek: s and Greek: t of which the latter is called a headless cross;" and then Mr. Willet concludes in these words, "And thus it plainly appears, that the marks whereby the papists say they honour Christ, are rather a dishonour to him, and are in very deed the cognizance of antichrist." Such an ingenious, and at the same time learned fancy, may perhaps outvie even those we have cited out of Mr. Brightman [in the annotations on Chap. iii. 14-22.], and may be equally serviceable to any country parson on the fifth of November, or on any day when he shall think fit to hold forth against the pope or popery. I suppose that Mr. Willet did not know that the Christians in the first ages [centuries] (as all Catholics to this day) made so frequent use of the sign of the cross, as it is witnessed by Tertullian above two hundred years before even any Protestant pretended that the popes began to be antichrists, or the great antichrist. And this, says he, they do by a tradition from father to son. At every setting forward or going about any thing, at coming home or going out, at putting on our clothes, at going to bathe, to table, to light a candle, to bed, to sit down, to any thing, we make the sign of the cross on our foreheads. And this is a tradition. The like is witnessed by St. John Chrysostom, St. Cyril of Jerusalem, and many of the Fathers. At the same time that with our hand we make the sign of the cross, we say these words, "in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost;" the words used when any one is made a Christian, according to the command of Christ. So that the action itself puts us in mind that Jesus Christ died for us on the cross; and by the words, we make a profession of our Christian faith, that we believe in one God and three Persons. Can we do this too often? Dare we be ashamed of doing it? Was ever any thing more ridiculous than to call this in very deed the cognizance of antichrist? What must Mr. Willet have thought of the Protestants, or what can they think of him, and such like folio scribbers, to prove the popes the beast of St. John's Revelation? What must, I say, Mr. Willet think of the public liturgy, or the book of common prayer, approved and used by the Church of England in his time, and which ordains that the sign of the cross shall be made by the priest on the forehead of every one that is baptized? This, according to Mr. Willet, is (when any one is made a Christian) to give him the badge, and visible sign of antichrist, to the dishonour of Christ, and what in very deed is the cognizance of antichrist. (Witham)

7:4

I heard the number of them that were sealed. By these determinate numbers need only be understood a great number of Jews converted and saved, though much greater was the number of the saved taken from among the Gentiles of all nations, of which it is said, I saw a great multitude, which no man could number, &c. (Witham) --- The number of one hundred and forty-four thousand is not to be taken in a literal and strict sense, but to express in general terms the great number of the elect; for it appears that the tribe of Dan, which certainly must have produced some elect, is not mentioned, and the tribe of Joseph is put in lieu of that of Ephraim: so that if it be supposed that these numbers must be taken literally, the tribe of Joseph would have produced a double number to that of any other tribe, since Manasses was his son, and the tribe of Dan would have produced none. (Ven. Bede)

7:10

Salvation to our God; i.e. our salvation is from God, to whom be praise for ever, Amen, benediction, or blessings, thanksgiving. &c. (Witham)

7:14

White in the blood of the Lamb. That is, they have been cleansed and purified from sin, by the death, merits, and grace of Christ crucified. (Witham) --- The whole of this verse must be understood in a mystical sense, for we are said to make our garments white in the blood of the Lamb, when we enter into his Church by baptism, or wash away our sins by penance or martyrdom. (Calmet)