✠ daily readings

jump to a date

readings are available from 2025-01-01 through 2027-12-31.

search

search by feast, season, or scripture reference.

type to search…

←
Lectionary 505 · Year I · Weekdays in Ordinary Time — Year I

Wednesday of the 34th week in Ordinary Time

→
USCCB ↗

First Reading · Daniel 5:1-6, 13-14, 16-17, 23-28

1Baltasar, the king, made a great feast for a thousand of his nobles: and every one drank according to his age.2And being now drunk, he commanded that they should bring the vessels of gold and silver, which Nabuchodonosor, his father, had brought away out of the temple, that was in Jerusalem, that the king and his nobles, and his wives, and his concubines, might drink in them.3Then were the golden and silver vessels brought, which he had brought away out of the temple that was in Jerusalem: and the king and his nobles, his wives, and his concubines, drank in them.4They drank wine, and praised their gods of gold, and of silver, of brass, of iron, and of wood, and of stone.5In the same hour there appeared fingers, as it were of the hand of a man, writing over against the candlestick, upon the surface of the wall of the king's palace: and the king beheld the joints of the hand that wrote.6Then was the king's countenance changed, and his thoughts troubled him: and the joints of his loins were loosed, and his knees struck one against the other.13Then Daniel was brought in before the king. And the king spoke, and said to him: Art thou Daniel, of the children of the captivity of Juda, whom my father, the king, brought out of Judea?14I have heard of thee, that thou hast the spirit of the gods, and excellent knowledge, and understanding, and wisdom are found in thee.16But I have heard of thee, that thou canst interpret obscure things, and resolve difficult things: now if thou art able to read the writing, and to shew me the interpretation thereof, thou shalt be clothed with purple, and shalt have a chain of gold about thy neck, and shalt be the third prince in my kingdom.17To which Daniel made answer, and said before the king: thy rewards be to thyself, and the gifts of thy house give to another: but the writing I will read to thee, O king, and shew thee the interpretation thereof.23But hast lifted thyself up against the Lord of heaven: and the vessels of his house have been brought before thee: and thou, and thy nobles, and thy wives, and thy concubines, have drunk wine in them: and thou hast praised the gods of silver, and of gold, and of brass, of iron, and of wood, and of stone, that neither see, nor hear, nor feel: but the God who hath thy breath in his hand, and all thy ways, thou hast not glorified.24Wherefore, he hath sent the part of the hand which hath written this that is set down.25And this is the writing that is written: MANE, THECEL, PHARES.26And this is the interpretation of the word. MANE: God hath numbered thy kingdom, and hath finished it.27THECEL: thou art weighed in the balance, and art found wanting.28PHARES: thy kingdom is divided, and is given to the Medes and Persians.

commentary

Three words appear on the plaster, MANE, THECEL, PHARES (v. 25), and the difficulty of reading them is the first thing Haydock's notes address. Stripped of vowels they are three sets of letters, mona, thokol, pros, the o added only for pronunciation, and Calmet explains why even the learned could hardly read them. Letters unconnected and almost without vowels can bear many meanings, as d b r in the same position might bear ten. Jerome holds that only three words were written and that the rest is the prophet's explanation, and Haydock sets this against the doubled Mene, Mene, Tekel, Upharsin of the Protestant version. Daniel's reading turns each word into a verdict, numbered and finished (v. 26), weighed and "found wanting" (v. 27), divided and given away (v. 28). The scene is set with equal care. The hand writes "over against the candlestick" (v. 5), and the king's knees strike together (v. 6).

The commentators fill in the court. Challoner, with Jerome and Usher, identifies Baltasar as Nabonides, grandson of Nabuchodonosor, called "son" in the Scriptural manner of descent; Calmet objects that profane authors make Nabonides a simple Babylonian who retired to Carmania, whereas this king was slain. The Chaldee of v. 1 may mean that he "drank wine before the thousand," more than any of them, or in their sight but apart, and Haydock reconstructs the setting from the Persian custom Athenaeus describes, a king behind a veiled door with a great chandelier before him, enough light for Baltasar to see the hand on his wall. Haydock adds that he "was not so drunk as to be deprived of sense." The sacrilege of v. 2 had a history. Only part of the temple vessels had been returned, Haydock notes, and they had been taken again and kept in the palace or in the temple of Bel. On v. 17 Haydock reads Daniel's "thy rewards be to thyself" as civil rather than contemptuous; he will give satisfaction "without regard to any recompense." Jerome supplies the end, that the king "would soon be divided with the sword," and Haydock judges that he "brought ruin upon himself by his wicked life" just as the Chaldean empire reached its height.

Daniel's charge in v. 23 identifies the offence exactly. The king praised gods "that neither see, nor hear, nor feel," and did not glorify "the God who hath thy breath in his hand," where Calmet glosses breath as the soul, as in Genesis ii. 7. The feast took the vessels of worship as tableware for a party, and the modern version is the same habit of treating holy things as decoration for one's own success, among people who would never think of it as sacrilege. Daniel's refusal of the purple and the gold chain shows the other side, a counsellor whose reading of the wall cannot be bought. The image that remains is a scale with a king on one pan, weighed by a hand he could see only to the joints, and found light.

· sources ·

The complete public-domain commentary this reading's note draws from, unabridged. Every claim in the note traces to a passage here.

First Reading Daniel 5:1-6, 13-14, 16-17, 23-28

Haydock Catholic Bible Commentary · Public Domain
5:1

Baltassar. He is believed to be the same as Nabonides, the last of the Chaldean kings, grandson to Nabuchodonosor. He is called his son (ver. 2, 11, &c.) according to the style of the Scriptures, because he was a descendant from him. (Challoner; St. Jerome in Isaiah xiii.; Usher, &c.) --- Some think that he was brother of Evilmerodac. (ver. 11.; Baruch i. 11.) But he seems rather to have been his son. (Jeremias xxvii. 7.) Profane authors place Neriglissor and Laborosoarchod between them. They were not of the royal family, and might be looked upon as usurpers, or reigned in some other place; or they did not meddle with the Jews. (Calmet) --- It is wonderful that Josephus should prefer these authors; (Tirinus) yet he abandons the dates given by them. (Antiquities x. 12. & c. Ap. 1.) They represent Nabonides as a simple Babylonian raised to the throne, defeated by Cyrus, and suffered to retire into Carmania; whereas, Baltassar was slain. (ver. 29.) (Calmet) --- The others were of a different lineage, and are mentioned by Eus.[Eusebius,] &c. Evilmerodac certainly preceded him on the throne, and honoured Joachim in the 37th years of his captivity. (Worthington) --- Thousand; or, "for his officers over a thousand men." (Theodot.) --- Every. Chaldee: "and drank wine before the thousand," more than any, for this was deemed a great perfection; or he drank in their presence, but apart. (Calmet) --- The Persian monarchs used to sit in a separate apartment, with a veil before the door, so that they could see the guests without being seen. A great chandelier was before them; (Atheneus iv. 10.) probably on the outside, otherwise it would have defeated their purpose. Light sufficient would appear for Baltassar to see the hand-writing on his chamber wall. (ver. 5.) (Haydock) --- According to the order of time, this chapter should be placed after the vii. and viii. (Calmet) --- But those contain visions. (Haydock)

5:6

Loosed, so that he quaked for fear. (Ezechiel xxix. 7.) (Calmet) --- He was not so drunk as to be deprived of sense. (Haydock) --- This happened in the 17th and last year of his reign, when Daniel was about a hundred years old, (Worthington) though we have no certain account of his age. (Haydock) --- He might be eighty-two when he died. (Calmet)

5:16

Difficult. Literally, "things which are tied," or perplexing. (Haydock) --- The Persians still used the like expressions, to imply an intelligent governor. (Chardin.)

5:17

Another. He does not refuse the offers, but civilly replies that he will give satisfaction without regard to any recompense.

5:23

Vessels. Only part had been returned to Sedecias: (Chap. i. 2.) but they were taken again, and kept in the palace, or in the temple of Bel. (Haydock) --- Breath, or soul. (Genesis ii. 7.) (Calmet)

5:25

Phares. These words consist of three letters, mona, thokol, pros, as we add o merely for pronunciation. Being unconnected and almost destitute of vowels, (Haydock) it is not easy even for the learned to read these words, or to ascertain their meaning. Thus d b r being placed in a similar situation, it would be impossible to determine the sense; as it may have ten different meanings, according as it is pronounced. (ver. 8. ) (Calmet) --- Mane is twice repeated, to shew the certainty and exactitude of the numbering. (Menochius) --- Yet in the sequel each word occurs once and unconnected, as it is here in the Vulgate; not Mene, Mene, Tekel, Upharsin, (Protestant; Haydock) "He hath numbered, weighed, and the dividers or the Persians" are upon thee, (T. [Tirinus?]) as Dalila said to Samson. Only three words (Haydock) were written. (St. Jerome) --- The rest contain the prophet's explanation. The Chaldean empire had now attained its utmost height. Its king brought ruin upon himself by his wicked life. (Haydock) --- He would soon be divided with the sword, and his kingdom shared between the Medes and Persians. (St. Jerome)

5:28

Persians. Those who confound Baltassar with Nabonides, say that Cyrus made himself master of all the empire. How then was it divided? Darius rather took possession of the greatest part while Cyrus had Persia, (Calmet) till his uncle's death. (Haydock)