✠ daily readings

jump to a date

readings are available from 2025-01-01 through 2027-12-31.

search

search by feast, season, or scripture reference.

type to search…

←
Lectionary 495 · Year I · Weekdays in Ordinary Time — Year I

Friday of the 32nd week in Ordinary Time

→
USCCB ↗

First Reading · Wisdom 13:1-9

1But all men are vain, in whom there is not the knowledge of God: and who by these good things that are seen, could not understand him that is, neither by attending to the works have acknowledged who was the workman:2But have imagined either the fire, or the wind, or the swift air, or the circle of the stars, or the great water, or the sun and moon, to be the gods that rule the world.3With whose beauty, if they, being delighted, took them to be gods: let them know how much the Lord of them is more beautiful than they: for the first author of beauty made all those things.4Or if they admired their power, and their effects, let them understand by them, that he that made them, is mightier than they:5For by the greatness of the beauty, and of the creature, the creator of them may be seen, so as to be known thereby.6But yet as to these they are less to be blamed. For they perhaps err, seeking God, and desirous to find him.7For being conversant among his works, they search: and they are persuaded that the things are good which are seen.8But then again they are not to be pardoned.9For if they were able to know so much as to make a judgment of the world: how did they not more easily find out the Lord thereof?

commentary

The reading opens with a verdict, "all men are vain, in whom there is not the knowledge of God" (v. 1), which the Septuagint, as Haydock notes, renders "foolish by nature, who are ignorant of God." The failure it describes is one of inference. Men saw "these good things," yet "could not understand him that is," nor "by attending to the works" recognise "who was the workman." Worthington fastens on the phrase "him that is." He who is, he says, "must be the most proper name of God," recalling Exodus 3:14. The argument then runs in two directions. If they were delighted by beauty, "the first author of beauty" must be lovelier (v. 3); if they admired power, its maker must be mightier (v. 4); for "by the greatness of the beauty, and of the creature, the creator of them may be seen" (v. 5).

Haydock's notes on verse 2 give the list of false gods its historical setting. Fire was "the chief god of the Persians"; the wind was honoured as Zephyrus; the worship of the stars, the zodiac or the Pleiads, was "most ancient and general"; the Egyptians "adored water above all, as the origin of other things," and Philo observes that they were therefore punished first by water. The sun and moon were worshipped under the names of Baal and Astarte. Calmet places this chapter at the head of a longer description of "the miseries of idolatry," meant to show the value of wisdom and piety. For verse 5 Haydock gathers witnesses from both Scripture and the pagans: Psalm 18 and Romans 1:20, and Cicero, who asks, "Who can look up to heaven, and be so foolish as not to allow that there is a God?" Worthington's summary on verse 1 holds the reading's tension: the philosophers perceived that creatures had a beginning and that there must be a first cause, which some confessed "but did not honour as they ought."

The text itself then weighs the guilt of these seekers. Such seekers "are less to be blamed. For they perhaps err, seeking God, and desirous to find him" (v. 6); and yet "they are not to be pardoned" (v. 8), because those able "to make a judgment of the world" should have found "the Lord thereof" more easily (v. 9). The passage rebukes the mind that stops at the creature, whether in ancient star-worship or in an admiration of the cosmos that never asks who made it. It requires that delight be followed through to its source. Cicero's question supplies the closing image, the face turned up toward the heavens.

· sources ·

The complete public-domain commentary this reading's note draws from, unabridged. Every claim in the note traces to a passage here.

First Reading Wisdom 13:1-9

Haydock Catholic Bible Commentary · Public Domain
13:1

Vain. Septuagint, "foolish by nature, who are ignorant of God." (Haydock) --- In this and the three following chapters, the miseries of idolatry are described, to shew the value of wisdom and piety. (Calmet) --- Without the knowledge of God, all is darkness, 1 Corinthians ii. 2. (St. Justin Martyr, Dialogue with Trypho) --- Is. He who is, must be the most proper name of God, Exodus iii. 14. Philosophers could perceive that all creatures had a beginning, and that there must be some first cause or God, whom some confessed, but did not honour as they ought, Romans i. (Worthington) --- Could not. Inasmuch as they were vain. (Haydock)

13:2

Fire. The chief god of the Persians. --- Wind. Zephyrus, &c. --- Air. Which is perhaps the wind. Socrates was accused of adoring nothing, but heaven and the clouds, (Aristot.[Aristotle?] nub.) as the Jews were. Nil præter nubes et Cœli numen adorant. (Juvenal xiv. 97.) --- Stars. The zodiac, or pleiads. This species of idolatry was most ancient and general. --- Water. The ocean, Neptune, &c. The Egyptians adored water above all, as the origin of other things. Hence they were punished first by it. (Philo, vit. Mor. 1.) --- Moon. These were mostly the objects of worship, under the names of Baal, Astarte, (Calmet) the Phœbus, or Dianæ of the Romans. (Haydock)

13:5

Thereby. God is announced by the heavens, and by all creatures, Psalm xviii. 1., and Romans i. 20. "Who can look up to heaven, and be so foolish as not to allow that there is a God?" (Cicero, Harusp.)