✠ daily readings

jump to a date

readings are available from 2025-01-01 through 2027-12-31.

search

search by feast, season, or scripture reference.

type to search…

←
Lectionary 382 · Year II · Weekdays in Ordinary Time — Year II

Saturday of the 13th week in Ordinary Time

→
USCCB ↗

First Reading · Amos 9:11-15

11In that day I will raise up the tabernacle of David, that is fallen: and I will close up the breaches of the walls thereof, and repair what was fallen: and I will rebuild it as in the days of old.12That they may possess the remnant of Edom, and all nations, because my name is invoked upon them: saith the Lord that doth these things.13Behold the days come, saith the Lord, when the ploughman shall overtake the reaper, and the treader of grapes him that soweth seed: and the mountains shall drop sweetness, and every hill shall be tilled.14And I will bring back the captivity of my people Israel: and they shall build the abandoned cities, and inhabit them: and they shall plant vineyards, and drink the wine of them: and shall make gardens, and eat the fruits of them.15And I will plant them upon their own land: and I will no more pluck them out of their land which I have given them, saith the Lord thy God.

commentary

The reach of this oracle turns on how one set of consonants is read. That they may possess the remnant of Edom (v. 12) has a real nation in view — Calmet notes that Edom was subdued by Hircan, along with the surrounding peoples — but the same letters, he adds, may be read Adam, "man," which is what the Septuagint has, and what St. James quotes at Acts xv. 17. Haydock gives the Greek as it stands: "that the rest of men might seek the Lord (Grabe substitutes me), and all the nations upon whom my [name is invoked]." One reading gives Israel a defeated neighbour; the other gives the rest of mankind a summons. Haydock takes both together — Edom and all mankind shall receive the glad tidings of salvation — but the fork is real, and it is the Greek text that the apostolic argument runs on. What follows is agricultural impossibility: the ploughman shall overtake the reaper, and the treader of grapes him that soweth seed (v. 13), the sowing and the harvest arriving on top of each other, with no interval of waiting in between.

That image is where the commentators divide. Challoner takes it as figure — the ploughman overtaking the reaper signifies "the great abundance of spiritual blessings which, as it were, by a constant succession, shall enrich the Church of Christ." Houbigant will not let the figure swallow the text. Munster, he complains, and Clarius after him, "see nothing but an allegory in this abundance and return," and he states the principle against them: "the literal sense ought to be adopted, when it involves no contradiction." Calmet supplies the evidence for the literal, that God had promised the faithful Israelites exactly this succession of crops (Leviticus xxvi. 5), and that the return of the ten tribes is specified again and again. On v. 11 he argues in the other direction, by elimination. The fallen tabernacle of David cannot mean the survival of Juda after Israel's collapse; the prosperity after the return from Babylon might do, but Zorobabel's authority was very precarious, and the Machabees were not even of the tribe of Juda, nor was their kingdom flourishing or durable. What is left, on his reading, is Christ. Worthington makes the same point from the other end: St. James, following St. Peter, explains the verse of the vocation of the Gentiles (Acts xv. 15).

Houbigant's rule is the thing to carry away, because it cuts against a habit rather than an error of fact. A reader who has learned that Amos is "really" about the Church will hear the vineyards and the gardens as decoration and stop attending to them — which is precisely the reduction Houbigant refuses, and which Calmet blocks by pointing at Leviticus. The promise is not less concrete for being fulfilled in Christ; it is more so, since the same God who says I will plant them upon their own land also says I will no more pluck them out. And the picture Amos leaves is not of a spiritualised abundance but of a farmer's year gone wrong in the best possible way: the man with the plough walking up behind the man with the sickle, before the field has been cleared.

· sources ·

The complete public-domain commentary this reading's note draws from, unabridged. Every claim in the note traces to a passage here.

First Reading Amos 9:11-15

Haydock Catholic Bible Commentary · Public Domain
9:11

David. St. James, after St. Peter, explains this of the vocation of the Gentiles, Acts xv. 15. (Worthington) --- After the fall of Israel, Juda still flourished: but this cannot be meant. The prosperity after the return from Babylon, or rather under Jesus Christ, must fulfil the prediction. Zorobalel had a very precarious authority, and the Machabees were not of the tribe of Juda, nor was their kingdom so flourishing or durable. (Calmet)

9:12

Edom, subdued by Hircan, with the surrounding nations. The same letters may be read Adam, "man," as the Septuagint have, agreeably to Acts xv. 17. (Calmet) --- "That the rest of men might seek the Lord, (Grabe substitutes me) and all the nations upon whom my," &c. Edom and all mankind shall receive the glad tidings of salvation. (Haydock)

9:13

Shall overtake, &c. By this is meant the great abundance of spiritual blessings; which, as it were, by a constant succession, shall enrich the Church of Christ. (Challoner) --- Munster, and his imitator, Clarius, see nothing but an allegory in this abundance and return, ver. 14. Yet the literal sense ought to be adopted, when it involves no contradiction. (Houbigant, pref. p. 297.) --- God promised a succession of crops to the faithful Israelites, (Leviticus xxvi. 5.) and the return of the ten tribes is frequently specified. (Calmet)

9:14

CHAPTER IX.