✠ daily readings

jump to a date

readings are available from 2025-01-01 through 2027-12-31.

search

search by feast, season, or scripture reference.

type to search…

←
Lectionary 272 · Weekdays — Easter

2nd Week of Easter - Sat

→
USCCB ↗

First Reading · Acts 6:1-7

1And in those days, the number of the disciples increasing, there arose a murmuring of the Greeks against the Hebrews, for that their widows were neglected in the daily ministration.2Then the twelve, calling together the multitude of the disciples, said: It is not reason that we should leave the word of God and serve tables.3Wherefore, brethren, look ye out among you seven men of good reputation, full of the Holy Ghost and wisdom, whom we may appoint over this business.4But we will give ourselves continually to prayer and to the ministry of the word.5And the saying was liked by all the multitude. And they chose Stephen, a man full of faith and of the Holy Ghost, and Philip and Prochorus and Nicanor, and Timon and Parmenas and Nicolas, a proselyte of Antioch.6These they set before the apostles: and they praying, imposed hands upon them.7And the word of the Lord increased: and the number of the disciples was multiplied in Jerusalem exceedingly. A great multitude also of the priests obeyed the faith.

commentary

Haydock's apparatus stops at a single word in v. 1 and refuses to let it pass. The Latin Græcorum stands for elleniston — "not ellenon," the note insists, with cross-references to two later chapters of Acts and to Legh's Critica Sacra. The Douay's "Greeks" flattens a distinction the compiler thought worth a separate entry, and the murmuring turns on it. The plain sense of the next verse is stranger still. It is not reason that we should leave the word of God and serve tables sounds like a division between the sacred and the merely practical until Calmet observes that "many think" this ministry of tables meant not only the distribution of corporal nourishment "but the dispensing of the holy Eucharist" — and then draws out what that implies: "as sacred and divine as was this latter duty, the apostles preferred before it, their obligation of preaching." Whatever else the twelve are doing, they are not offloading the low work. Calmet's parallel is that Paul "would not even baptize, lest it should be a prejudice to the performance of this great duty."

Whether the seven are ordained at all is a live question in the sources, not a settled one. Calmet records "the opinions of some, that these deacons were only the dispensers of corporal food, and therefore very different from the ministers of the altar, who now bear that name," and the counter-argument is cumulative: the qualifications demanded are spiritual, they receive the imposition of the apostles' hands, Paul later requires of deacons "in a manner, the same conditions as in bishops," and Stephen and Philip preach, baptize and dispute immediately after — "all which would not have been necessary for any secular stewardship." Ignatius supplies the blunt version: deacons "are not servitors of meat and drink, but ministers of the Church of God... even as St. Stephen to St. James." Calmet's own resolution is the most interesting, because it dissolves the question instead of winning it. In the earliest days the faithful received the Eucharist after a meal taken together, in imitation of the Supper; so the deacons who presided over the first tables, "after having distributed the corporeal food to the assembly, ministered also the food of life, which they received from the hand of the bishop." Two tables, one office.

The remedy the apostles adopt is politically shrewd. Tirinus notices that all seven names are Greek, and reads the choice as calculated "to silence more effectually all future murmurs, by giving to the aggrieved party protectors of their own nation" — the complaint answered by handing its authors the office. What the institutional fix could not do was guarantee the men. Of the seven, Haydock reports, nothing certain survives about most: "their acts have perished." Philip is called an evangelist and, by Eusebius and Tertullian, an apostolic man, with a tomb Jerome says was shown at Cæsarea beside those of his four daughters. And Nicolas, the proselyte of Antioch, is still being argued over — Epiphanius and many others accusing him of being "the author, or at least the occasion" of the Nicolaite and Gnostic sects, while Clement of Alexandria and Augustine acquit him and put the heresies down to "an abuse of some expressions, which he uttered in his simplicity, and which were susceptible of a good and bad sense." The structure held. One of the seven has a history the book goes on to tell, one a marked grave, most a blank, and one a permanent argument.

· sources ·

The complete public-domain commentary this reading's note draws from, unabridged. Every claim in the note traces to a passage here.

First Reading Acts 6:1-7

Haydock Catholic Bible Commentary · Public Domain
6:1 · bibliography — editions & variants cited above

Græcorum, Greek: elleniston, not Greek: ellenon. See also Acts ix. 29. and xi. ver. 20. See Legh Critica Sacra.

6:2

And serve tables. The apostles did not judge it proper for them to be so much employed in managing that common stock, out of which every one, as they stood in need, were supplied, as to meat, and all other necessities: this took up too much of their time, which might be better employed in preaching, &c. (Witham) --- Word of God. The most essential duty of an apostle and bishop, is to announce the word of God. St. Paul would not even baptize, lest it should be a prejudice to the performance of this great duty, for which he had been sent. Many think, that this ministry of the tables, here signifies, not only the distribution of corporal nourishment, but the dispensing of the holy Eucharist. As sacred and divine as was this latter duty, the apostles preferred before it, their obligation of preaching. (Calmet)

6:3

Look ye out among you seven men, and men of a good repute and character, full of the Holy Ghost. (Witham) --- Diverse circumstances prove, that they were chosen to be about the altar also. They were to be full of the Holy Ghost and wisdom: they received the imposition of the apostles' hands, and in them St. Paul requireth, in a manner, the same conditions as in bishops; all which would not have been necessary for any secular stewardship. See Acts xiii. 3. Immediately after their ordination, they preached, baptized, disputed, as we see in St. Stephen, &c. &c. Hence St. Ignatius: "it is ours to please by all means the deacons, who are for the ministry of Jesus Christ; for they are not servitors of meat and drink, but ministers of the Church of God. For what are deacons but imitators or followers of Christ, ministering to bishops, as Christ to his Father, and working unto him a clean and immaculate work, even as St. Stephen to St. James? (Ep. ad Tral.)

6:5

By the names of these seven, it would appear, that they were all Greeks. The reason of this, most probably, is to silence more effectually all future murmurs, by giving to the aggrieved party protectors of their own nation. (Tirinus) --- The history of Stephen occurs hereafter. Philip, in the 8th chapter, is call an evangelist, that is, a preacher of the gospel. By Eusebius, Tertullian, and others, he is called an apostle, that is, an apostolic man. See Lives of the Saints, and Roman Martyrology, June 6. --- St. Jerome says, his [Philip's] tomb, and that of his four daughters, the prophetesses, were to be seen at Cæsarea, in Palestine. (Ep. ad Eustoch.) --- Of the rest, except Nicolas, nothing certain is known: their acts have perished. Nicolas, as appears from the text, was a proselyte, first to Judaism, then to Christianity. St. Epiphanius, and many others, accuse him of being, by his incontinency, the author, or at least the occasion of the impure sects of Nicoalites and Gnostics. Clement of Alexandria, and St. Augustine, acquit him of this, and attribute the above heresies to an abuse of some expressions, which he uttered in his simplicity, and which were susceptible of a good and bad sense. See Baronius and Tillemont.

6:6

And they, that is, the apostles, laid, or imposed hands upon them. These deacons, therefore, were designed and ordained for a sacred ministry, and not only to manage the common stock, and temporals of the faithful. This is proved, 1. By the qualifications required in such men, who were to be full of the Holy Ghost. 2. This is evident from their ecclesiastical functions mentioned in this book of the Acts, and in the epistles of St. Paul, and by the ancient Fathers. St. Stephen and St. Philip immediately preached the gospel, as we find in this, and the 8th chapter; they baptized those that were converted. In the first ages they assisted the bishops and priests at their divine office, and distributed the sacred chalice, or cup of the holy Eucharist. They succeeded as it were, the Levites of the old law. And in the chief Churches, the deacons, or the arch deacons in the first ages, had the chief administration of the ecclesiastical revenues, as we read of St. Laurence, at Rome. (Witham) --- Imposed hands upon them. Notwithstanding the opinions of some, that these deacons were only the dispensers of corporal food, and therefore very different from the ministers of the altar, who now bear that name, it must nevertheless be observed, that the most ancient Fathers, Sts. Justin, Irenæus, &c., have acknowledged in them the two-fold character, and always style them the ministers of the mysteries of God. At the commencement of Christianity, the faithful generally received the holy Eucharist after a repast, which they took together, in imitation of our Saviour, who instituted the Sacrament after supper. Now the deacons, who presided over the first tables, after having distributed the corporeal food to the assembly, ministered also the food of life, which they received from the hand of the bishop. Thus were they ministers of both the common and sacred tables. Afterwards, they had assistants called sub-deacons, and as among the Gentile converts, there did not exist that community of goods, as at Jerusalem, their chief employment became to serve the bishop in the oblation of the holy sacrifice. (Calmet)