✠ daily readings

jump to a date

readings are available from 2025-01-01 through 2027-12-31.

search

search by feast, season, or scripture reference.

type to search…

←
Lectionary 252 · Weekdays — Lent

5th Week of Lent – Tues

→
USCCB ↗

First Reading · Numbers 21:4-9

4And they marched from mount Hor, by the way that leadeth to the Red Sea, to compass the land of Edom. And the people began to be weary of their journey and labour:5And speaking against God and Moses, they said: Why didst thou bring us out of Egypt, to die in the wilderness? There is no bread, nor have we any waters: our soul now loatheth this very light food.6Wherefore the Lord sent among the people fiery serpents, which bit them and killed many of them.7Upon which they came to Moses, and said; We have sinned, because we have spoken against the Lord and thee: pray that he may take away these serpents from us. And Moses prayed for the people.8And the Lord said to him: Make a brazen serpent, and set it up for a sign: whosoever being struck shall look on it, shall live.9Moses therefore made a brazen serpent, and set it up for a sign: which when they that were bitten looked upon, they were healed.

commentary

The Hebrew of v. 8 does not say "brazen." It says fiery — the same word used of the snakes in v. 6 — and only v. 9 mentions brass, which is why Calmet proposes rendering the command "make a seraph, and fix it upon a standard." That is the term's whole difficulty. The serpents are called fiery, Challoner explains, because those bitten "were burnt with a violent heat," and Haydock notes that the identical word names an order of angels; the seraph of Isaias xiv. 29 is a winged serpent, and Haydock cites Herodotus on the winged snakes that came out of Arabia into Egypt each spring unless the ibis intercepted them, and Pliny's prœster, named from its burning. The complaint that provoked them repays a second look too. "Our soul now loatheth this very light food" (v. 5) is the manna, and Haydock reports the Septuagint's sharper wording — "our soul is indignant at this most empty bread," bread with no solidity in it.

Calmet observes that an object of that shape fixed to a standard "would resemble one suspended on a cross," and Justin Martyr places it at the entrance of the tabernacle. Its later history is why the commentators argue: Ezechias destroyed it because it had come to be treated with superstitious honours (4 Kings xviii. 4), and Haydock's comment is that the best things are often abused. Worthington draws the doctrinal conclusion — God commands this image erected in the same law by which he forbids the images of idols, so the prohibition cannot be a blanket one. Haydock presses further: pictures "serve the ignorant instead of books," with St. Gregory's caution against improper respect attached, and the same caution is owed to Scripture, which the unlearned wrest to their own destruction (2 Peter iii. 16). "If every thing must be rejected which is liable to abuse, what part of the creation will be spared?" Against the charge that the bronze was a talisman — Marsham's, which Calmet calls impious — the answer is Wisdom xvi. 5, 7: the effect was to be attributed entirely to God, and as Kimchi and Muis note, the figure of a serpent was calculated to increase the terror rather than remove it. Jonathan draws the conclusion the story needs: only those were healed who raised their hearts to God.

So the cure was never in the metal, and looking was never merely looking. Challoner reads the standard as a figure of Christ crucified "and of the efficacy of a lively faith in him, against the bites of the hellish serpent"; Theodoret states the symmetry, that as the old serpent infected the whole human race, Christ gives life to those who look at him with entire confidence; Calmet supplies the detail that makes the figure exact — the brazen serpent had no poison in it though it wore the shape of the deadliest thing in the camp, "so Jesus Christ assumed our nature, yet without sin." The modern form of the Israelites' error is not idolatry but the appetite in v. 5 — the settled conviction that what heaven provides is thin stuff, empty bread, and cannot sustain a serious adult life. Haydock takes that complaint straight into the Eucharist, where the substance of bread is gone and only the accidents appear, so that to the worldly receiver it "seems very empty and light, though in reality it be supersubstantial." The remedy in Numbers is almost insultingly small: men lying in the sand with poison in them, a pole standing up in the middle of the camp, and nothing required but to turn the head.

· sources ·

The complete public-domain commentary this reading's note draws from, unabridged. Every claim in the note traces to a passage here.

First Reading Numbers 21:4-9

Haydock Catholic Bible Commentary · Public Domain
21:4

Edom, one of the princes, had refused them a passage; upon which they went by Salmona to Phunon, (chap. xxxiii. 37, 42,) where they probably murmured, (chap. v.,) and were bitten by the serpents, as we read in this chapter. (Calmet)

21:5

God. They had before often directed their complaints against the two brothers. Now, Aaron being no more, they attack God himself, who had always resented the injury done to his ministers. --- Food. So they call the heavenly manna: thus worldlings loathe the things of heaven, for which they have no relish. (Challoner) --- Septuagint, "our soul is indignant at this most empty bread," which has no solidity in it, nor support. Many translate the Hebrew, "most vile bread." Thus, in the blessed eucharist, the substance of bread is removed, and the accidents only appear; so that to the worldly receiver, it seems very empty and light, though in reality it be supersubstantial; containing Christ himself, who fills the worthy communicant with grace and comfort, and enables him to go forward on the road to heaven, without fainting. (Haydock)

21:6

Fiery serpents. They are so called, because they that were bitten by them were burnt with a violent heat. (Challoner) --- Hence they are called seraphim, by which name an order of angels are known. The Egyptians adored a serpent which they called serapis, at Rome; and they represented their god serapis, with a serpent entwining a monstrous figure, composed of a lion, a dog, and a wolf. (Macrobius, Saturn i. 20.) The seraph was a winged serpent, Isaias xiv. 29. xxx. 6. Such often infested Egypt, in spring, coming from Arabia, unless they were intercepted by the ibis. Their wings resembled those of bats. (Herodotus, ii. 76.; Mela, &c.) God probably sent some of this description into the camp of the Israelites. (Calmet) --- Some call them prœster, (Pliny, [Natural History?] xxiv. 13,) from their burning; others the hydra, or, when out of water, the chershydra, the venom of which is most dangerous. The Septuagint style them simply, "the destroying, or deadly serpents." See Bochart, T. ii. B. iii. 13.; Deuteronomy viii. 15.; Wisdom xvi. 5, 10.) (Haydock)

21:8

Brazen. Hebrew, "fiery." But, in the following verse, it is said to have been "of brass." We might translate, "make a seraph, and fix it upon a standard," (Calmet) in which form it would resemble one suspended on a cross. It was placed at the entrance of the tabernacle. (St. Justin Martyr, First Apology) Ezechias afterwards destroyed it, because it was treated with superstitious honours, 4 Kings xviii. 4. Thus the best things are often abused. (Haydock) --- God commands this image to be erected, while he forbids all images of idols. (Worthington) --- By comparing the different passages of Scripture we may discern the true import of them. Pictures may often prove very useful and instructive. They serve the ignorant instead of books. But then the ignorant must be carefully instructed not to treat them with improper respect, as St. Gregory admonishes. And is not the same caution requisite for those who read even the word of God, lest they wrest it to their own destruction, as both the unlearned and the unstable frequently do, 2 Peter iii. 16. If every thing must be rejected which is liable to abuse, what part of the creation will be spared? The Bible, the sacraments, all creatures must be laid aside. For we read, (Romans viii. 20, 22,) the creature was made subject to vanity --- every creature groaneth. (Haydock) --- It is probable that Moses represented on the standard such a serpent, as had been the instrument of death. This was not intended for a charm or talisman, as Marsham would impiously pretend. (Chron. x. p. 148.) Such inventions proceed from the devil; and the Marsi were famous for curing the bites of serpents, by giving certain plates of brass. (Arnob. ii.) See Psalm lviii. 5. But this image was set up by God's express command; and the Book of Wisdom (xvi. 5, 7) assures us, that the effect was entirely to be attributed to him, the figure of a brazen serpent being rather calculated to increase than to remove the danger. (Kimchi; Muis) Hence Jonathan well observes, that only those were healed who raised their hearts to God. (Calmet)

21:9

A brazen serpent. This was a figure of Christ crucified, and of the efficacy of a lively faith in him, against the bites of the hellish serpent, John iii. 14. (Challoner) (St. Ambrose; Apol. i. 3.) As the old serpent infected the whole human race, Jesus Christ gives life to those that look at him with entire confidence. (Theodoret, q. 38.) The brazen serpent was destitute of poison, though it resembled a most noxious animal; so Jesus Christ assumed our nature, yet without sin. (Calmet)