✠ daily readings

jump to a date

readings are available from 2025-01-01 through 2027-12-31.

search

search by feast, season, or scripture reference.

type to search…

←
Lectionary 134 · Year B · Sundays in Ordinary Time — Year B

25th Sunday in Ordinary Time

→
USCCB ↗

First Reading · Wisdom 2:12, 17-20

12Let us, therefore, lie in wait for the just, because he is not for our turn, and he is contrary to our doings, and upbraideth us with transgressions of the law, and divulgeth against us the sins of our way of life.17Let us see then if his words be true, and let us prove what shall happen to him, and we shall know what his end shall be.18For if he be the true son of God, he will defend him, and will deliver him from the hands of his enemies.19Let us examine him by outrages and tortures, that we may know his meekness, and try his patience.20Let us condemn him to a most shameful death: for there shall be respect had unto him by his words.

commentary

The speakers in this passage are the ungodly, and their plan runs in stages. They lie in wait for the just man because he "upbraideth us with transgressions of the law" (v. 12); they resolve to test his claim to be the son of God by whether God delivers him (v. 18); they try his meekness "by outrages and tortures" (v. 19); and they condemn him "to a most shameful death" (v. 20). Worthington notes the progression from vice to violence: infidels "are not content to live in riot: they also persecute the just." The last clause of v. 20 is unclear. The Syriac and Vatable, as Calmet reports, take there shall be respect had unto him by his words to mean he will be punished for what he has said, citing Matthew 26:61, while Menochius reads it as "we shall hence form a judgment of his real merits." Haydock suspects irony, as though the just man had "foolishly flattered himself with the divine protection," and points to Matthew 27:43.

Haydock's note records how closely the passage fits the Passion. The resemblance to the conduct of the Jews toward Christ is so striking that Grotius claimed some Christian had altered the text, but the Fathers, Calmet says, "adduce it as a clear prediction," and Worthington cites it as a prophecy of "the Jewish malice" (Matt. 27:41; Mark 14:53). Read with those citations, the passage turns the taunt of v. 18 back on those who make it. Their test of whether God will defend the just man is the taunt Haydock finds again in Matthew 27:43, and the reader is shown a man whose words are held against him and whose only defence is his patience.

· sources ·

The complete public-domain commentary this reading's note draws from, unabridged. Every claim in the note traces to a passage here.

First Reading Wisdom 2:12, 17-20

Haydock Catholic Bible Commentary · Public Domain
2:12

Just. Infidels are not content to live in riot: they also persecute the just. (Worthington) --- This passage points out the conduct of the Jews towards our Saviour, in so striking a manner, that Grotius would assert it has been altered by some Christian. But the Fathers adduce it as a clear prediction (Calmet) of the Jewish malice, Matthew xxvii. 41., and Mark xiv. 53. (Worthington)

2:20

Words. Or he shall be punished for what he has said. (Syriac, Vat.[Vatable?], &c.) (Matthew xxvi. 61.) (Calmet) --- We shall hence form a judgment of his real merits, (Menochius) unless this be spoken ironically; as if the just had foolishly flattered himself with the divine protection, Matthew xxvii. 43. (Haydock)