✠ daily readings

jump to a date

readings are available from 2025-01-01 through 2027-12-31.

search

search by feast, season, or scripture reference.

type to search…

←
Lectionary 124 · Year A · Sundays in Ordinary Time — Year A

22nd Sunday in Ordinary Time

→
USCCB ↗

First Reading · Jeremiah 20:7-9

7Thou hast deceived me, O Lord, and I am deceived: thou hast been stronger than I, and thou hast prevailed. I am become a laughingstock all the day, all scoff at me.8For I am speaking now this long time, crying out against iniquity, and I often proclaim devastation: and the word of the Lord is made a reproach to me, and a derision all the day.9Then I said: I will not make mention of him, nor speak any more in his name: and there came in my heart as a burning fire, shut up in my bones, and I was wearied, not being able to bear it.

commentary

"Thou hast deceived me, O Lord, and I am deceived" (v. 7) is the hardest opening line any prophet gives us, and the commentators spend their effort on what it cannot mean. Challoner states the limit: Jeremias is not charging God with untruth. What he calls deceit is a concealment — when he accepted the prophetic commission, the greatness of the evils that commission would bring on him was not disclosed. Tirinus reaches for the Hebrew, which he renders "thou hast enticed me," and locates the moment precisely: the enticement worked when I declined the office. Tournemine reads the Hebrew as a conditional instead — "If thou, Lord, hast deceived me, I am" — which turns the accusation into a supposition the prophet is only entertaining. Calmet's observation covers both: the oriental languages are far loftier than ours and state ordinary things in the strongest available terms, so the violence of the phrase is not a measure of the charge behind it.

What the prophet thought he had been promised is a separate question. Haydock is blunt — God never promised he should suffer no persecution — while Jerome suggests Jeremias may have understood his commission as a mission to the Gentiles, on the strength of the words spoken at his calling. The complaint of v. 8 is not, on Theodoret's reading, that the prophet is mocked but that the word of God is; Calmet supplies the taunt itself, the standing question of where these enemies from the north have got to, and the plagues so long announced. Menochius alone declines to leave the prophet blameless: to conclude from the mockery that his words had produced no good effect is a real fault, a venial pusillanimity, and it is on that low estimate of his own preaching that Jeremias resolves to stop speaking. The fire in the bones (v. 9) is the answer to the resolution rather than to the mockery. Sanctius reads it as continual grief, and Haydock glosses the sequel in the first person — I could not however refrain from speaking — filing the verse alongside three other places where a man finds he cannot hold his peace. The silence was tried, and it failed. Calmet, seeing fear and joy alternate through the passage, sets Jeremias beside Paul and beside the Saviour himself: what the saints exhibit is human weakness and the power of divine grace at the same time, in the same voice.

The passage rebukes a specific modern instinct: to treat the failure of a word to persuade as evidence that it should not have been spoken, and to call the resulting silence realism. Menochius names it as a fault, small but real, and Jeremias arrives at it by an honest route — long labour, visible contempt, no result he can point to. What the text requires is not more confidence in the outcome but the recognition that the word does not belong to the one carrying it. He tried to put it down; it burned, shut up in his bones, until carrying it was easier than not.

· sources ·

The complete public-domain commentary this reading's note draws from, unabridged. Every claim in the note traces to a passage here.

First Reading Jeremiah 20:7-9

Haydock Catholic Bible Commentary · Public Domain
20:7

Thou hast deceived, &c. The meaning of the prophet is not to charge God with any untruth; but what he calls deceiving, was only the concealing from him, when he accepted of the prophetical commission, the greatness of the evils which the execution of that commission was to bring upon him. (Challoner) --- Hebrew, "thou hast enticed me," when I declined the office. (Tirinus) --- God never promised that he should suffer no persecution. (Haydock) --- Jeremias might also have supposed that he was to be sent to the Gentiles, chap. i. 5. (St. Jerome in chap xxv. 18.) --- The oriental languages are much more lofty than ours, and express common things in the strongest manner. (Calmet) --- We may perceive the different emotions of fear and joy (Du Hamel) with which the prophet was actuated, like St. Paul, and our Saviour himself. The saints evince the weakness of man and the power of divine grace. (Calmet) --- Hebrew, "If thou, Lord, hast deceived me, I am," &c. (Tournemine)

20:8

Day. They keep asking where are these enemies from the north, the plagues? &c. (Calmet) --- He is sorry to see the word of God despised, (Theodoret) and is guilty of a venial pusillanimity, concluding that his words had no good effect. (Menochius)

20:9

And there, or "for," &c. I was grieved continually. (Sanctius) --- I could not however refrain from speaking, Acts xvii. 16., and 1 Corinthians ix. 16., and Job xxxii. 18.